dw.com
Uruguay Marks 30 Years of Searching for Disappeared During Dictatorship
On May 20, 2025, a silent march in Montevideo, Uruguay, marked the 30th anniversary of the search for nearly 200 people disappeared during the 1973-1985 dictatorship; the event included the participation of Lucía Topolansky, former vice president and widow of former president José Mujica.
- What are the potential long-term implications of Uruguay's continued pursuit of justice for the disappeared, both domestically and internationally?
- The ongoing search for the disappeared reflects a broader struggle for accountability and historical reconciliation in Uruguay. The government's recognition of mothers involved in the search and the continued activism point towards an extended process of confronting the legacy of state-sponsored violence and its lasting consequences. This persistent effort could influence transitional justice movements in other countries.
- What is the significance of this year's march for the disappeared in Uruguay, considering its proximity to the recent funeral of former president José Mujica?
- In Uruguay, a silent march of thousands commemorated the 30th anniversary of the search for nearly 200 disappeared people from the 1973-1985 dictatorship. This year's event followed the recent state funeral for former president José Mujica, highlighting the continued struggle for truth and justice. The marchers carried photos of the missing, and their names were read aloud, with the crowd responding "Present.
- How does the ongoing search for the disappeared in Uruguay connect to broader regional patterns of repression and human rights violations during the Southern Cone dictatorships?
- The march underscores the unresolved issue of disappeared persons in Uruguay, despite decades of efforts and some convictions of military personnel. The event's significance is heightened by its proximity to Mujica's funeral, emphasizing the enduring political and social impact of the past. The participation of Lucía Topolansky, Mujica's widow and former vice-president, reinforces this connection.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing centers on the families' enduring pain and frustration, which is understandable given the context. The headline and opening paragraphs effectively set this emotional tone. While this is not inherently biased, the article could benefit from a more balanced presentation of the government's efforts, even if those efforts have been insufficient. Including a section detailing the government's stated goals and actions would create a more comprehensive picture.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective, focusing on facts and quotes from those involved. While the emotional weight of the story is clear, the article avoids inflammatory language. Words like "solemn" and "cold" describe the atmosphere without judgment.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the ongoing search for the disappeared and the sentiments of their families, but it could benefit from including perspectives from the government or military regarding their efforts and challenges in the investigation. It also omits details on the specific actions taken by the current government to address this issue beyond mentioning their commitment to uncovering the truth. While acknowledging space constraints, including a brief summary of governmental actions would improve the article's balance.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights Uruguay's continued efforts to address human rights violations from its past military dictatorship. The annual march and ongoing search for the disappeared demonstrate a commitment to justice and accountability, aligning with SDG 16's goals of promoting peaceful and inclusive societies, providing access to justice for all, and building effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels. The government's recognition of the Mothers and Families of Uruguayan Disappeared Detainees and ongoing investigations further reinforce this commitment.