foxnews.com
US Border Encounters Plummet to Historic Low Under Trump Policies
In June 2025, US border encounters with inadmissible aliens reached a record low of 25,243, with zero releases by DHS for the second straight month, a sharp contrast to the previous administration's policies resulting in the release of hundreds of thousands of aliens monthly.
- What is the primary cause for the unprecedented decrease in inadmissible alien encounters and releases at the US borders in June 2025?
- In June 2025, Border Patrol encounters of inadmissible aliens at US borders plummeted to a historic low of 25,243, compared to over 250,000 in December 2023. No inadmissible aliens were released by DHS for the second consecutive month, a stark contrast to the tens of thousands released monthly under the previous administration.
- What are the potential long-term implications of the current border enforcement strategy on the US immigration system and broader societal impacts?
- The shift in border enforcement strategy reveals a significant impact on the flow of inadmissible aliens into the US. The lower number of encounters suggests that deterrence measures are effective in curbing illegal immigration. This efficiency may serve as a model for future immigration policies.
- How do the current border enforcement policies under the Trump administration differ from previous policies under the Biden administration, and what are the resulting consequences?
- The drastic reduction in border encounters and releases is directly linked to policy changes under the Trump administration. These changes included ending catch-and-release, closing parole pathways, reinstating the "Remain in Mexico" policy, and resuming border wall construction. The result is a swift and efficient immigration process.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the decrease in border crossings during the Trump administration as an undeniable success, attributing it solely to his policies. The headline itself, "All Quiet on the Western Front," uses a dramatic comparison to emphasize the low numbers, potentially downplaying or obscuring other relevant factors. The repeated use of phrases such as "historic lows" and "unprecedented success" reinforces this positive framing. The article also heavily favors information and sources supportive of the Trump administration's policies.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language to portray the Biden administration's policies negatively. Terms like "disguised the entry," "abusing parole," "catch-and-release," and "authoritarian excess" carry strong negative connotations. Conversely, the Trump administration's actions are described using positive terms like "enforcement policies," "speed and efficiency," and "restoring the rule of law." Neutral alternatives could include 'border control measures,' 'parole utilization,' 'border apprehension procedures,' and 'immigration enforcement'.
Bias by Omission
The article omits discussion of potential push factors driving migration from Central and South America, such as economic hardship, violence, and political instability. It also doesn't address the humanitarian aspects of border control or the perspectives of asylum seekers. The article focuses heavily on the number of inadmissible aliens encountered but lacks context regarding the overall number of people attempting to cross the border. Additionally, it lacks diverse sources beyond those associated with the Trump administration.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between the Trump and Biden administrations' border policies, portraying them as diametrically opposed and neglecting the complexities and nuances of immigration policy. It simplifies a multi-faceted issue into a simplistic 'good' vs 'bad' narrative. For example, it implies that increased detention is automatically a positive outcome without considering potential negative consequences such as human rights violations or the strain on the immigration system.
Gender Bias
The article lacks specific details on gender demographics among those apprehended or released at the border, failing to analyze the potential impact of border policies on different genders. There is no gendered language that immediately flags as biased.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a significant decrease in illegal border crossings under the Trump administration, suggesting improved border security and enforcement of immigration laws. This contributes to "Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions" by upholding the rule of law, reducing crime rates potentially associated with illegal immigration, and enhancing national security.