US Coal Ash Holds $8.4 Billion in Rare Earth Elements

US Coal Ash Holds $8.4 Billion in Rare Earth Elements

edition.cnn.com

US Coal Ash Holds $8.4 Billion in Rare Earth Elements

Analysis of US coal ash reveals it contains up to 11 million tons of rare earth elements—nearly eight times current US reserves—worth an estimated $8.4 billion, offering a potential domestic source to reduce reliance on foreign imports and support clean energy development.

English
United States
EconomyScienceClean EnergyRare Earth ElementsEnvironmental SustainabilitySupply Chain SecurityCoal AshResource Recovery
University Of Texas At AustinUniversity Of WyomingWater Research Institute At West Virginia UniversityInternational Energy AgencyDepartment Of EnergyCnn
Bridget ScanlonDavin BagdonasPaul ZiemkiewiczJennifer Granholm
How might the economic value of rare earth extraction from coal ash impact future coal ash management and environmental remediation efforts?
Coal ash, while a hazardous waste, offers a unique opportunity to address the US's rare earth element deficit. Extracting these elements from existing stockpiles could alleviate supply chain vulnerabilities and support the growth of clean energy sectors. The economic value of recovered rare earths could even offset the cost of improving coal ash storage.
What is the economic and strategic significance of discovering potentially $8.4 billion worth of rare earth elements in US coal ash reserves?
The US possesses millions of tons of coal ash, a byproduct of coal burning, containing potentially $8.4 billion worth of rare earth elements—nearly eight times the amount in current US reserves. This presents a domestic source of crucial materials for clean energy technologies, reducing reliance on foreign imports.
What are the potential environmental and economic challenges of extracting rare earth elements from coal ash, and how might these challenges be mitigated?
While extraction presents challenges—varying concentrations and potential environmental impacts from using strong acids—the economic incentive and national security benefits could outweigh the costs. Future research will likely focus on optimizing extraction techniques and minimizing environmental effects, making this a promising area for innovation.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article is framed positively towards the potential of extracting rare earth elements from coal ash. The headline and opening paragraphs highlight the potential economic value and environmental benefits (the 'trash to treasure' mantra) without fully balancing this with the potential environmental risks and economic challenges. The selection and prominence given to quotes from researchers supporting this method further reinforce this framing.

2/5

Language Bias

The language used is generally neutral, but certain phrases could be considered subtly biased. For example, describing coal as the "planet's dirtiest fossil fuel" is a value judgment, although factually accurate. The frequent use of positive terms like "treasure trove" and "huge potential" in relation to coal ash could be seen as overly optimistic and could be replaced with more neutral phrasing such as "significant source" or "substantial opportunity".

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the potential benefits of extracting rare earth elements from coal ash, but gives less attention to the potential environmental risks and challenges associated with this process. While the costs and environmental impacts of extraction are mentioned, a more in-depth discussion of these concerns, including specific data on potential pollution and remediation costs, would provide a more balanced perspective. The article also omits discussion of alternative sources of rare earth elements and their relative environmental impacts.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplistic eitheor framing by focusing primarily on the potential economic benefits of extracting rare earths from coal ash as a solution to the need for domestic rare earth supplies, while minimizing the complexities and potential drawbacks of this approach. It does not fully explore other potential solutions to the rare earth supply issue, such as improving mining techniques for existing rare earth deposits or developing alternative materials that do not rely on rare earths.

Sustainable Development Goals

Responsible Consumption and Production Positive
Direct Relevance

The article highlights a method of turning coal ash waste into a resource for rare earth elements crucial for clean energy technologies. This directly contributes to responsible consumption and production by promoting resource efficiency, waste reduction, and the circular economy. Extracting valuable rare earth elements from existing coal ash reduces the need for new mining, minimizing environmental impact and promoting sustainable resource management.