nrc.nl
US Financial Markets' Tepid Response to Trump's Actions
Despite President Trump's controversial actions, including attempts to influence the Federal Reserve and impose tariffs, US financial markets exhibit unusual calm, prompting questions about potential risks and underlying factors.
- What are the potential reasons behind this seemingly irrational market calm?
- One explanation is that large corporations benefit from Trump's policies, such as lower taxes and deregulation, outweighing concerns about his actions. Another is the US's unique position as a reserve currency nation, making it less susceptible to rapid capital flight compared to other countries. This status allows the US to borrow more easily and cheaply.
- Why are financial markets reacting so mildly to President Trump's actions, which include attempts to influence the Federal Reserve and impose tariffs?
- The relatively muted market response to Trump's actions is puzzling to many economists and analysts. While some indicators like rising gold prices and longer-term Treasury yields show some unease, the overall reaction is far less dramatic than expected given the gravity of Trump's actions. This is especially concerning given 88 out of 94 economists polled by the Financial Times believe the markets are underestimating the risks.
- What are the potential long-term implications of the current market calm and Trump's actions, especially concerning the independence of the Federal Reserve?
- The market's calm may embolden Trump to take more extreme steps, potentially further eroding the independence of the Federal Reserve. This lack of immediate market reaction increases the risk of long-term damage to the US economy and the global financial system, undermining the principles of property rights and investor protections. The current calm may mask significant future problems.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of the financial market's reaction to Trump's actions, acknowledging both the lack of a strong negative reaction and the underlying concerns. However, the concluding section emphasizes the potential dangers and shortsightedness of the market's calm, potentially framing the situation more negatively than a purely neutral perspective would.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although terms like "rauwe machtspolitiek" (raw power politics) and "griezelige kalmte" (creepy calm) carry strong connotations. The use of quotes from experts adds objectivity. However, phrases such as "Trump Always Chickens Out" (TACO) show a clear bias against Trump.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including perspectives from those who believe the market's reaction is justified. While acknowledging some explanations for the calm market, it doesn't fully explore counterarguments. Also, the long-term economic consequences of Trump's policies are only briefly mentioned.
Sustainable Development Goals
Trump's actions, such as undermining the independence of the Fed and prioritizing the interests of large corporations, could exacerbate economic inequality. His policies might benefit large corporations at the expense of smaller businesses and individuals, leading to a widening wealth gap. The quote "Kapitaal krijgt vrij baan in de VS, ten koste van de burger en het klimaat" ("Capital gets free rein in the US, at the expense of the citizen and the climate") highlights this concern.