dw.com
US Imposes 10% Tariff on Ukrainian Goods
The US imposed a 10% tariff on Ukrainian goods, impacting small producers, while Ukraine's low tariffs on US goods offer negotiation leverage; Ukraine exported $874 million to the US in 2018, with cast iron and pipes accounting for a significant portion.
- What is the immediate impact of the new 10% US tariff on Ukrainian businesses and the US-Ukraine trade relationship?
- Ukraine's exports to the US totaled $874 million in 2018, with $363 million from cast iron and $112 million from pipes. A new 10% US tariff will mostly impact small Ukrainian producers, according to Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko. She noted that Ukraine's tariffs on US goods are low, offering negotiating leverage.
- How does the 10% US tariff on Ukrainian goods compare to tariffs imposed on other countries, and what are the potential implications of this difference?
- The 10% tariff contrasts with higher rates imposed on other countries (e.g., 31% for Moldova, 20% for the EU). Ukraine exports over 600 product categories to the US, 65 exceeding $1 million in value. Svyrydenko believes fair tariffs benefit both nations.
- What are the long-term economic and political consequences for Ukraine resulting from the new US tariffs and potential retaliatory measures from other nations?
- While the 10% tariff is considered manageable, Danilo Getmantsev, head of the Ukrainian parliament's finance committee, warns of potential negative consequences from retaliatory tariffs by other countries, particularly the EU, impacting Ukraine's aid.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing emphasizes the concerns of Ukrainian officials, presenting their statements prominently. While it mentions the US action, it primarily focuses on Ukraine's response and potential countermeasures. This emphasis may unintentionally sway the reader towards a more sympathetic view of Ukraine's situation.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, although some terms like "economic cynicism" (attributed to Hetmantsyev) have a subjective connotation. Otherwise, the article presents the facts in a straightforward manner, using direct quotes from officials to convey their positions.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the Ukrainian perspective and the potential impact on their economy. While it mentions the US's rationale for imposing tariffs indirectly, it does not delve into the details of the US perspective or explore counterarguments to the Ukrainian officials' assessments. Omitting these perspectives limits the reader's ability to fully understand the context of the tariff decision and the broader trade relationship.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the Ukrainian government's relatively optimistic view and the more cautious assessment of the parliamentary committee head. It doesn't fully explore the nuances of the situation, such as the potential for negotiation or the long-term implications of the tariffs for both countries. The framing lacks the complexities of international trade relations.
Sustainable Development Goals
The 10% tariff imposed by the US on Ukrainian goods will primarily impact small producers, potentially hindering economic growth and job creation in Ukraine. While the impact is described as not "critical", the potential negative effect on Ukrainian exports and the economy is undeniable. The article highlights that Ukraine exports over 600 categories of goods to the US, with 65 exceeding $1 million in value. The tariffs could reduce this export volume and revenue.