welt.de
US Invasion of Panama: Operation Just Cause
On December 20, 1989, the US launched "Operation Just Cause" to overthrow Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega following his declaration of war and attack on US soldiers, resulting in a swift military victory but also significant casualties.
- How did Manuel Noriega's past relationship with the US contribute to the events of December 1989?
- Noriega's decades-long collaboration with the CIA, involvement in drug trafficking, and actions against the US ultimately led to his downfall. His defiance, culminating in the declaration of war, provided the pretext for US intervention, highlighting the complex relationship between the two nations and the consequences of defying a major power.
- What prompted the US military intervention in Panama in December 1989, and what were the immediate consequences?
- On December 20, 1989, the United States launched "Operation Just Cause" to remove Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega. This followed Noriega's declaration of war against the US and an attack on US soldiers. The operation involved 27,000 US troops and resulted in significant casualties on both sides.
- What long-term impacts did the US intervention in Panama have on US foreign policy and the relationship between the US and Latin America?
- The invasion of Panama demonstrated the US's willingness to use military force to protect its strategic interests and combat drug trafficking in its sphere of influence. Noriega's actions, while reckless, also exposed the limitations of US influence and the challenges of intervention in complex political situations. The long-term impact included the installation of a new Panamanian government and the continued debate surrounding US foreign policy.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames Noriega as the primary antagonist, emphasizing his actions and their consequences. The US intervention, while presented as a response, is largely described without substantial critical examination of its proportionality or long-term implications. The headline (if there were one) and introduction would likely reinforce this framing.
Language Bias
The article uses strong language to describe Noriega's actions and character, such as "hässlichen (und höchst illegalen) Deals," "Diktator," and "Größenwahn oder Realitätsverweigerung." While descriptive, these terms lean toward judgment rather than objective reporting. More neutral alternatives could include: "controversial dealings," "authoritarian leader," or "misjudgment."
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the actions and motivations of the US and Noriega, but omits significant details about the internal political dynamics within Panama leading up to the invasion. The perspectives of Panamanian civilians, outside of the brief mention of casualties, are largely absent. The reasons for Panamanian opposition to Noriega are underdeveloped. While acknowledging space constraints is important, the lack of context on Panamanian viewpoints limits the reader's understanding of the situation's complexity.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the conflict as a clash between Noriega and the US, neglecting the internal complexities within Panama and the various actors involved. While Noriega's actions are highlighted as a provocation, the article doesn't fully explore the range of motivations and perspectives within Panama itself.
Gender Bias
The article primarily focuses on the actions of male political figures. While there is mention of civilian casualties, there's no specific breakdown by gender. The lack of female voices or perspectives might inadvertently reinforce gender imbalances in the narrative of the events.
Sustainable Development Goals
The US intervention in Panama, while controversial, ultimately led to the removal of a dictator (Manuel Noriega) and the installation of a democratically elected government. This action, although forceful, contributed to the establishment of more just and strong institutions in Panama, aligning with SDG 16, which promotes peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, providing access to justice for all and building effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.