
lexpress.fr
US lowers tariffs on Japanese autos to 15%
President Trump signed an executive order lowering tariffs on Japanese cars to 15% and ensuring that most other Japanese products won't exceed that rate, confirming Japan's interpretation of their July agreement.
- What broader context explains this decision and its implications?
- This decision resolves a dispute over the interpretation of a July agreement between the US and Japan. Japan had argued the agreement capped tariffs at 15%, while the US claimed it was an additional 15%. The executive order validates Japan's interpretation. This follows similar tariff reductions granted to the European Union.
- What are the immediate impacts of the reduced tariffs on Japanese automobiles entering the US?
- The tariff reduction from 25% to 15% provides Japan with tariff treatment similar to the EU. This is effective seven days after publication in the US Federal Register. Japanese automakers will see significantly reduced costs for exporting to the US.
- What are the potential long-term implications of this agreement beyond immediate tariff changes?
- Beyond tariffs, the agreement includes substantial Japanese investment in the US ($550 billion, with 90% of profits staying in the US), Japanese purchases of $8 billion in US goods, and increased purchases of US-made aircraft (including 100 Boeing planes). However, the agreement does not address tariffs on steel and aluminum, remaining at 50%, and some points, such as the specifics of the Japanese investment, are still under negotiation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a relatively neutral account of the agreement between the US and Japan regarding tariffs, presenting both perspectives and outlining the details of the agreement. However, the inclusion of quotes from Japanese officials expressing satisfaction with the agreement might subtly lean towards portraying the agreement more favorably to Japan. The emphasis on the delay in publishing the decree also highlights potential Japanese concerns, balancing the narrative.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. Terms such as "surtaxes," "agreement," and "decrees" are used factually. There is minimal use of loaded language or emotionally charged terms.
Bias by Omission
While the article provides a comprehensive overview of the agreement, it omits details on the specific sectors exempted from the 15% tariff, beyond mentioning aeronautics, raw materials unavailable in the US, and generic drugs. Further detail on the exact products and the rationale for their exemption would provide a more complete picture. The article also lacks specific information about the timetable for the $8 billion purchase of US products promised by Japan.
Sustainable Development Goals
The agreement between the US and Japan aims to boost economic growth through increased trade and investment. The lowering of tariffs on Japanese automobiles and other products will stimulate economic activity in both countries, creating jobs and fostering economic growth. Japanese investments in the US, totaling $550 billion, will further contribute to economic expansion and job creation in the United States. Conversely, increased purchases of American goods by Japan will also support American jobs and economic growth.