nrc.nl
US May Grant First Deep-Sea Mining License, Defying International Law
The Metals Company seeks a US license for commercial deep-sea mining, potentially violating international law by mining the seabed for valuable metals needed for electric vehicle batteries, despite concerns about environmental damage and the slow progress of international regulations.
- How does TMC's pursuit of a US mining license challenge the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea's principle of the "common heritage of mankind"?
- TMC's pursuit of a US license stems from the company's financial constraints and dissatisfaction with the slow progress of the International Seabed Authority (ISA) in establishing mining regulations. This action challenges the ISA's mandate to regulate deep-sea mining in international waters, potentially setting a precedent that undermines the concept of shared resources.
- What are the long-term implications of the US potentially granting this license on international cooperation regarding deep-sea resources and environmental protection?
- The US government's decision on TMC's license application will significantly impact the future of deep-sea mining and international cooperation on ocean resource management. A positive decision could trigger a rush for deep-sea resources, disregarding environmental concerns and potentially causing irreparable damage to fragile deep-sea ecosystems. Conversely, rejection could strengthen the ISA's role and accelerate the development of globally accepted regulations.
- What are the immediate consequences if the US grants The Metals Company a license to commercially mine the deep seabed, disregarding the International Seabed Authority's regulations?
- The Metals Company (TMC) aims to obtain the first commercial deep-sea mining license from the US government, potentially defying international regulations and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. This unilateral action could initiate deep-sea mining outside the internationally regulated framework, prioritizing US interests over the common heritage of mankind principle.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing favors The Metals Company's perspective. The headline (if any) and introduction likely highlight the potential economic benefits and the company's readiness to begin mining. The sequencing of information presents the company's arguments first, followed by counterarguments, potentially influencing readers to perceive the company's position more favorably. The repeated emphasis on the company's financial interests and technological advancements further strengthens this bias.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language, such as describing the concerns of environmentalists as "fear" and characterizing the ISA's pace as "slow." The phrase "for those who can reach it" in the context of the easily accessible minerals implies a sense of entitlement for those who exploit the resources. Neutral alternatives might include using more descriptive and less subjective terms, such as "concerns" instead of "fear," and "deliberate process" instead of "slow." The description of Reagan's statement as 'bad' is subjective and opinionated.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the perspective of The Metals Company and the potential benefits of deep-sea mining, while giving less attention to the concerns of environmental groups and the potential negative consequences. The perspectives of scientists researching the potential impact on deep-sea ecosystems are mentioned, but their specific findings and concerns are not detailed. Omitting this crucial information creates an imbalance and could mislead readers into believing the benefits outweigh the potential harms without a comprehensive understanding of the risks.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between the economic benefits of deep-sea mining (helping the energy transition) and the environmental concerns. It simplifies a complex issue by framing it as an eitheor choice, neglecting the possibility of alternative solutions or more sustainable approaches to obtaining critical metals.
Sustainable Development Goals
Deep-sea mining poses a significant threat to fragile deep-sea ecosystems. The potential damage to biodiversity and the disruption of delicate ecological balances are major concerns. The article highlights concerns from environmental groups and scientists about the irreversible harm that could be caused by mining in these unexplored areas.