theglobeandmail.com
US Recession Probability at 40-45% Due to Trump's Tariffs: Citigroup
Citigroup's chief economist predicts a 40-45% chance of a US recession due to President Trump's tariffs, expecting the largest negative impact on growth during the second half of the year, while warning of potential long-term damage to US economic institutions.
- How do market reactions to tariffs and attacks on the Federal Reserve influence the long-term economic outlook for the US?
- The tariffs' negative effects are compounded by market reactions and President Trump's attacks on Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, potentially causing long-term damage to the US economy and its institutions. This loss of confidence in US policies, as evidenced by market responses, may reduce future growth potential. The uncertainty surrounding US policies across administrations adds to long-term instability.
- What is the immediate economic impact of the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, and what is the likelihood of a US recession?
- Citigroup's chief economist, Nathan Sheets, estimates a 40-45% chance of a US recession due to the impact of President Trump's tariffs. He expects second-quarter GDP growth driven by pre-tariff consumer spending, but anticipates the largest negative impact on growth in the second half of the year. Sheets describes the tariffs as a stagflationary shock.
- What are the potential long-term structural consequences of current US economic policies, and how might these affect future growth and the global role of the dollar?
- The potential for lasting structural damage to the US economy due to undermining its institutions is a key concern. This could necessitate downward revisions of real GDP growth estimates for the next 3-5 years. The risk of foreign investors reducing treasury holdings is present, but a massive selloff is deemed unlikely due to its negative implications for both parties.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the narrative largely through the lens of Citigroup's economic analysis, emphasizing potential negative consequences of tariffs and the administration's actions. The headline (if one were to be created) might read something like "Citigroup Warns of 40% Recession Chance Amid Trump Tariffs." This framing prioritizes the negative economic outlook and potentially downplays any potential benefits of the tariffs or alternative perspectives. The focus is on the negative impacts and potential long-term structural damage, potentially neglecting any short-term benefits.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, employing factual reporting of economic forecasts and statements. However, phrases such as "stagflationary shock" and "lasting structural damage" carry negative connotations. While descriptive, they aren't overtly biased. More neutral alternatives might include 'significant economic impact' and 'potential long-term economic consequences.'
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the economic forecasts and statements of Citigroup's chief economist, providing a limited perspective on the issue. Counterarguments or alternative economic viewpoints are not presented. Omission of perspectives from the Trump administration or other economists could limit a comprehensive understanding of the situation and the impacts of tariffs.
False Dichotomy
There is no explicit presentation of a false dichotomy. However, the framing implicitly suggests that tariffs are solely responsible for potential negative economic impacts, neglecting other potential contributing factors.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the negative impacts of tariffs on the U.S. economy, potentially leading to a recession and hindering economic growth. This directly affects decent work and employment opportunities.