US Sees Surge in Ticks, Lyme Disease Cases

US Sees Surge in Ticks, Lyme Disease Cases

theguardian.com

US Sees Surge in Ticks, Lyme Disease Cases

Increased blacklegged tick populations in the US are causing a rise in Lyme disease cases and emergency room visits for tick bites, with climate change a likely contributing factor; preventative measures like wearing light-colored clothing and using insect repellent are encouraged.

English
United Kingdom
HealthClimate ChangeSciencePublic HealthLyme DiseaseTicksAlpha-Gal SyndromeTick-Borne Illnesses
Fordham UniversityCenters For Disease Control And Prevention (Cdc)University Of Rhode IslandTick Encounter Resource CenterTickspottersPhelps Hospital
Thomas DanielsThomas MatherShalom SokolowWebb Kane
What is the impact of the rising blacklegged tick population in the US on public health?
The US is experiencing a surge in blacklegged tick populations, leading to increased Lyme disease cases and emergency room visits. Tick-borne illnesses like alpha-gal syndrome are also on the rise, impacting outdoor enthusiasts. The Fordham Tick Index reached its highest risk level this year.
How does climate change contribute to the increased prevalence of ticks and tick-borne illnesses?
Climate change is likely a factor in the expanding range and increased numbers of ticks, as warmer temperatures extend their active season. Increased tick encounters have led to more emergency room visits for tick bites, though not all result in Lyme disease. The rise in cases highlights the need for preventative measures.
What long-term strategies are needed to mitigate the risks associated with the expanding range and increasing number of ticks?
The increase in tick-borne illnesses necessitates public health initiatives focused on prevention and early detection. Further research is needed to understand the full impact of climate change on tick populations and the spread of associated diseases. The long-term effects on healthcare systems and individual well-being require attention.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The article emphasizes the increased risk of tick-borne illnesses but also highlights expert advice to remain active outdoors while taking precautions. This balanced framing avoids overly alarming readers, although the high-risk Fordham Tick Index rating is prominently featured.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and objective, relying on data and expert quotes. Words like "flourishing" to describe tick populations might be slightly emotive but are not overly alarmist. The use of words like "prudent" and "proactive" encourage a balanced response.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on Lyme disease and alpha-gal syndrome, but other tick-borne illnesses are mentioned only briefly. While acknowledging other illnesses exist, the limited detail might underrepresent their prevalence and severity, potentially misinforming readers about the full range of risks associated with tick bites.

1/5

False Dichotomy

The article doesn't present a false dichotomy, but it could benefit from more nuanced discussion of the risks versus rewards of outdoor activities. While caution is stressed, the framing might unintentionally discourage outdoor recreation disproportionately.

Sustainable Development Goals

Good Health and Well-being Negative
Direct Relevance

The article highlights a significant increase in tick-borne illnesses like Lyme disease and alpha-gal syndrome in the US. This surge in cases directly impacts human health, leading to emergency room visits, and the need for medical attention and treatment. The rise in tick populations and their expanding range pose a substantial threat to public health and well-being. The negative impact is further emphasized by the potential for misdiagnosis and unnecessary antibiotic use, which can disrupt the gut microbiome.