nrc.nl
Van der Heijden's Book on Parents' WWII Involvement
Chris van der Heijden's "Over de rand laait vuur" details his parents' World War II involvement: his mother's NSB membership and his father's SS service on the Eastern Front, revealing their motivations through personal letters and documents, creating a nuanced portrayal avoiding simple judgments.
- How did the pre-war intellectual and political climate influence the choices made by Van der Heijden's parents?
- The book challenges simplistic narratives of WWII by showing how seemingly ordinary people with intellectual ideals could make morally reprehensible choices. Henk's initial attraction to the Verdinaso and later the SS stemmed from his belief that liberal democracy was failing and that a corporatist state was a better alternative. Miep's NSB membership reflects a similar belief system.
- What specific actions did Van der Heijden's parents take during WWII, and what were the immediate consequences of these actions?
- Chris van der Heijden's new book, "Over de rand laait vuur," details his parents' involvement in WWII: his mother, Miep, was an NSB member, and his father, Henk, volunteered for the SS on the Eastern Front. The book uses extensive personal letters and documents to paint a nuanced portrait, avoiding simple judgments.
- What are the long-term implications of this book for understanding individual choices within the context of historical atrocities, and how might it contribute to a more complex narrative of WWII?
- Van der Heijden's work prompts reflection on the complexities of individual agency within historical contexts, particularly on the motivations behind collaboration and violence. The book's detailed examination of his parents' lives suggests that understanding these motivations requires grappling with their intellectual and emotional landscapes, rather than resorting to broad condemnation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing of the review is largely positive, focusing on the literary merit of the book and the author's attempts at understanding his parents' past. The headline emphasizes the positive reception and potential of the book. The review spends significant time discussing the author's prior work and its reception, connecting it to the current book. This framing might create a perception that the book is more about personal reconciliation than a critical examination of historical actions.
Language Bias
The language used in the review is generally neutral and descriptive. While it acknowledges the gravity of the parents' actions, it doesn't resort to inflammatory or judgmental language. Words like "foute" (wrong) are used but within the context of the time and the overall neutral analysis. However, terms like "romantische idealisten" (romantic idealists) to describe the parents' pre-war beliefs might be interpreted as slightly loaded, potentially softening the image of their later actions. More explicitly critical words such as "collaborators" or "traitors" are omitted.
Bias by Omission
The review focuses heavily on the author's parents and their involvement with NSB and SS, but it lacks detailed information on the specific nature of their actions and the extent of their participation. While the author mentions his father's involvement in the SS and his mother's NSB membership, there's limited exploration of the impact these actions had on others. The absence of a more thorough investigation into the consequences of their choices leaves a gap in the reader's understanding of the full weight of their involvement. The review also does not mention other perspectives or opinions regarding the family's actions during the war. This omission might leave the reader with an incomplete picture, potentially minimizing the gravity of their choices.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the author's parents, whose actions during WWII contributed to societal inequalities. The father's involvement in the SS and the mother's NSB affiliation represent a stark example of collaboration with a regime that promoted discrimination and oppression, exacerbating existing inequalities. The book explores the complexities of their choices and their impact, but the actions themselves undeniably contributed to negative impacts on the SDG of Reduced Inequalities.