lexpress.fr
Vietnam's Balancing Act: Courting the US Amidst China's Shadow
Facing new US tariffs, Vietnam's Communist Party General Secretary To Lam offered to eliminate all tariffs on American goods in April 2025, aiming to improve relations with Washington despite concerns about its role as a transit point for Chinese goods circumventing US tariffs.
- What are the immediate economic and political consequences of Vietnam's attempt to appease the US through tariff elimination, given China's role in its export sector?
- On April 2, 2025, following Donald Trump's announcement of massive tariffs on foreign imports, Vietnam's Communist Party chief To Lam offered to eliminate all tariffs on American goods to avoid a 46% tax on its US exports. This was a bid to court Washington, but faces obstacles due to China's influence.
- How do the increased Vietnamese exports to the US and the concurrent rise in imports from China affect US-Vietnam trade relations and the broader geopolitical dynamics in the region?
- Vietnam's attempt to improve relations with the US is hindered by its role as a potential conduit for Chinese goods circumventing US tariffs. Despite actions like purchasing Boeing planes and a deal with SpaceX, US suspicion remains due to a surge in Vietnamese exports to the US mirroring a rise in imports from China.
- What are the long-term implications of Vietnam's balancing act between the US and China, considering its role in global supply chains and the potential for escalating trade tensions?
- Vietnam's economic boom, fueled by the US-China trade war, positions it as a central player in global electronics assembly. However, its strategic location between the US and China leaves it vulnerable to geopolitical pressures, forcing it to balance competing interests.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the suspicion and distrust of the US towards Vietnam, highlighting comments from officials like Peter Navarro. This narrative structure casts doubt on Vietnam's intentions, even when presenting evidence of Vietnamese attempts to cooperate. The headline (if one were to be created from this text) could likely reflect this bias, focusing on US suspicion rather than the complexities of the situation. The sequencing of events reinforces this distrust, starting with Trump's announcement of tariffs and then describing Vietnam's actions as reactive rather than proactive.
Language Bias
The article uses strong language such as "obstacle de taille" (major obstacle) and characterizing Peter Navarro's statement as "brutal." The repeated use of words suggesting suspicion and distrust ('méfiante,' 'soupçons') subtly influences reader perception. More neutral alternatives could include replacing 'brutal' with 'strong' or 'critical', and instead of 'soupçons,' phrasing could focus on 'concerns' or 'questions.'
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the US-Vietnam relationship, particularly concerning trade and the suspicion of Chinese goods being rerouted through Vietnam to avoid tariffs. However, it omits potential Vietnamese perspectives beyond official statements and actions. The article doesn't explore in depth the economic impact of the trade war on Vietnam's internal economy or the social consequences for Vietnamese workers. The complexities of Vietnamese domestic politics and its independent economic strategies are largely absent. While acknowledging space limitations, a more balanced perspective would include voices from Vietnamese businesses, economists, and citizens.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy between Vietnam cooperating fully with the US and being a 'colony of China.' The reality is likely far more nuanced, with Vietnam navigating a complex geopolitical situation and attempting to balance its relationship with both superpowers. The framing suggests that Vietnam must choose a side, when the nation's actual strategy might be a more complex balancing act.
Sustainable Development Goals
Vietnam's economic growth is significantly boosted by increased exports to the US, creating jobs and improving the overall economy. However, this growth is intertwined with the complexities of US-China trade relations, creating uncertainty.