sueddeutsche.de
Violence Against Workers in Germany: A Growing Concern
A 2018 study by the German health and welfare services professional association (BGW) revealed that nearly 80 percent of respondents in the care and support professions experienced violence in the preceding 12 months, prompting concerns about the increasing prevalence of workplace violence in Germany.
- What factors contribute to the rise in reported workplace violence incidents in Germany?
- While it's unclear if more incidents are occurring or if reporting is simply improving, factors like long wait times, staff shortages, and emotional distress among patients (especially in emergency rooms) are cited as contributing to aggressive behavior. The BGW emphasizes the need for improved reporting and workplace prevention strategies.
- What is the scope and impact of workplace violence in various professions across Germany?
- The problem affects a wide range of professions, from healthcare workers and social services staff to police officers and library employees. A 2018 BGW study showed nearly 80% of those in care and support professions experienced violence in the previous year. This violence ranges from verbal abuse to physical assault, significantly impacting worker well-being and safety.
- What preventative measures can be implemented to mitigate workplace violence and support affected employees in Germany?
- The article highlights the importance of proactive measures, including de-escalation training, development of escape plans, and employer-provided preventative measures tailored to specific professions. Promoting open communication about violence, reducing stigma, and providing emotional support are also crucial for supporting affected workers and fostering a safer workplace.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of workplace violence, highlighting the experiences of various professions and offering solutions. The introduction broadly sets the scene without favoring a particular viewpoint. The inclusion of statistics from the BGW study adds objectivity. However, the focus on de-escalation techniques might inadvertently downplay the systemic issues contributing to workplace violence.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. Terms like "verbal Ausfälle" (verbal attacks) and "Aggressionen" (aggressions) are accurately descriptive. There's no use of inflammatory language or emotionally charged terms. The use of quotes from experts lends credibility.
Bias by Omission
While the article covers various professions, it could benefit from a more diverse representation of industries and demographics affected by workplace violence. The focus is mainly on care and helping professions. A discussion of the root causes of violence (e.g., societal factors, understaffing, poor management) would enhance the analysis. The article also focuses heavily on de-escalation techniques without discussing potential legal recourse or preventative measures.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the high rates of violence and aggression experienced by professionals in various sectors, leading to significant negative impacts on their mental and physical health. The reported increase in work-related injuries due to violence further underscores the detrimental effects on well-being. The long-term consequences, including PTSD, directly affect the SDG target of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages.