dw.com
Vulnerability of Internet Infrastructure to Solar Storms
A 2021 study reveals that the internet infrastructure is vulnerable to strong solar storms, which can cause long-term disruptions and cost billions in damages, as illustrated by historical events and potential mitigation strategies.
- What are the proposed solutions to enhance the internet's resilience against future solar storms?
- Proposed solutions include shifting internet infrastructure southward (less susceptible to solar storms), using shorter, more resilient connections, and implementing additional overhead cables, which are less vulnerable than long submarine cables needing numerous repeaters.
- What is the main vulnerability of the internet infrastructure concerning solar storms, and what are the potential consequences?
- The internet's vulnerability lies in its reliance on long undersea cables and satellites, which are susceptible to damage from strong electromagnetic interference caused by solar storms. A severe solar storm could cause long-term internet outages, costing billions (e.g., $7 billion in the US alone for a single day outage).
- What historical events demonstrate the impact of solar storms on infrastructure, and what is the scale of potential future disruptions?
- The 1859 Carrington Event caused telegraph network failures in North America and Europe, while a 1989 storm blacked out Quebec for nine hours. A 2012 storm of similar magnitude narrowly missed Earth. A future Carrington-level event could cause months- or years-long communication and power outages across large areas.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of the potential impact of solar storms, acknowledging both the potential for overhyped claims and the genuine risks involved. While it highlights the potential for significant disruption, it also notes that the claims are sometimes overhyped. The use of phrases such as "But it would be a mistake to fully dismiss them as mere alarmism" demonstrates an attempt to avoid either extreme of alarmism or dismissal.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and informative. Terms like "violent solar storms" and "paralyze the internet" are strong, but accurately reflect the potential consequences discussed in the cited research. The article uses precise terminology such as G1-G5 classification of solar storms and avoids sensationalism.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from mentioning potential mitigation strategies beyond those suggested by Jyothi. While Jyothi's suggestions are included, a broader discussion of governmental, corporate, and individual preparedness measures would provide a more comprehensive picture. Additionally, the economic consequences beyond the US are not discussed.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article directly addresses the vulnerability of global internet infrastructure to solar storms, highlighting potential disruptions to communication and power supply. This significantly impacts the functionality and resilience of crucial infrastructure, hindering progress towards SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) which aims for resilient infrastructure, inclusive and sustainable industrialization, and fostering innovation. The potential for widespread and long-term outages underscores the need for improved infrastructure resilience and preparedness for such events.