nrc.nl
Warfare: A Navy SEAL's Ramadi Experience
Warfare", a film based on the memories of Navy SEALs, reconstructs a bloody 2006 incident in Ramadi during the battle against Al-Qaeda, showing the intense violence and lasting psychological impact on American soldiers while offering an anti-war perspective through a visceral, realistic depiction of combat.
- What tactical approach did the US military use in the Battle of Ramadi, and what were its immediate consequences?
- The 2006 Battle of Ramadi, depicted in the film "Warfare". was a success for the US military. Ramadi, then Al-Qaeda's Iraqi headquarters, was retaken in six months via a strategy of "keeping the city whole", using local sheikhs and minimal bombing. Air support was used for intimidating "shows of force", not widespread destruction.
- How does "Warfare" utilize the firsthand experiences of a former Navy SEAL to shape its narrative and perspective?
- Warfare" meticulously reconstructs a September 2006 incident where a Navy SEAL platoon established a temporary observation post in a Ramadi house, unintentionally angering nearby jihadists. This event, based on SEALs' recollections, highlights the film's focus on a specific, bloody encounter within the larger context of the battle for Ramadi.
- Does "Warfare" successfully challenge conventional war film tropes, and what are the potential implications of its approach to depicting the psychological toll of combat?
- The film's director, Alex Garland, and co-director, Ray Mendoza (a former Navy SEAL), aimed to create a visceral experience mirroring Mendoza's PTSD. The film's unflinching portrayal of violence and its aftermath contrasts with typical war film portrayals, aiming for authenticity and eschewing typical narrative arcs. The film's anti-war stance is conveyed through this realistic depiction of war's brutality and its lasting effects on soldiers.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative is framed through the lens of the American soldiers, emphasizing their experiences and perspectives. The headline, while not explicitly biased, focuses on the film as a reconstruction of the event from the SEALs' point of view, implicitly prioritizing their narrative. The interview largely centers on the filmmakers' and soldiers' feelings, without much space given to Iraqi experiences.
Language Bias
While largely neutral, the article uses terms such as "jihadists," which has negative connotations. The phrase "bloedig pingpong" (bloody ping-pong) is evocative and dramatic, though not explicitly biased. Alternatives could be "violent back-and-forth" or "cycle of violence.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the American soldiers' experiences in the Battle of Ramadi, neglecting the perspectives of Iraqi civilians and combatants. The suffering of Iraqi families caught in the crossfire is mentioned but not explored in detail. The long-term consequences of the battle for the Iraqi population are largely omitted, leaving a significant gap in understanding the overall impact of the conflict.
False Dichotomy
The film and the article surrounding it present a somewhat simplified view of the conflict, focusing primarily on the experiences of the American soldiers. This framing risks creating a false dichotomy between American soldiers as victims and the Iraqi population as a monolithic entity. The complexities of the motivations and actions of all parties involved are minimized.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the Battle of Ramadi and its aftermath, highlighting the complexities of war and the cyclical nature of violence. The initial success in retaking Ramadi from Al-Qaeda was followed by the rise of ISIS, illustrating a failure to establish lasting peace and stability. The film 'Warfare' depicts the human cost of war and raises questions about the justifications for military intervention, pointing to the lack of long-term solutions for peace and justice in the region. The quote, "We heroverden Ramadi op Al-Qaida, maar ons vertrek schiep een vacuüm waar IS weer insprong. Het was een soort pingpong, een zeer bloedig soort pingpong," directly reflects this cyclical violence and the failure to establish lasting peace.