elmundo.es
Weakening US Consumption Threatens Global Economic Stability
Weakening US private consumption, fueled by falling financial markets and eroding consumer confidence, threatens the global economy; the IMF lowered its 2025 US growth forecast to 1.8%, down from 2.7%, raising concerns about the stability of the global financial system.
- What are the immediate impacts of the decline in US private consumption and how does it affect global economic forecasts?
- The US private consumption, representing 68% of the GDP in 2023, is the main driver of the American economy. Recent growth, however, is threatened by a confluence of negative factors including falling financial markets and shrinking household financial maneuverability. This has led to the IMF lowering its US growth forecast for 2025 from 2.7% to 1.8%.
- How do the four factors influencing US private consumption interact, and what is the relative significance of each in the current economic climate?
- Four factors influence US private consumption: income, wealth, expectations, and financial capacity. While positive income effects from a strong labor market (4.2% unemployment in March 2025) persist, negative wealth effects arise from the 10% drop in the S&P 500 since the beginning of the year. Consumer confidence is also down, and the savings rate has fallen to a meager 3.7% in Q4 2024.
- What are the long-term risks to the global financial system stemming from potential instability in the US economy, beyond the immediate concerns about private consumption?
- The most significant risk is not the decline in private consumption itself, but the potential erosion of the US financial system's global pillars. While unlikely, concerns persist about China's capacity to trigger a crisis through its US debt holdings. The real danger is domestic: poor economic policies could undermine the global role of US debt and the dollar, as evidenced by the recent appreciation of the Swiss franc and yen against the dollar.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the narrative around the potential decline of US private consumption as a major threat to the global economy. The headline (if there were one) would likely emphasize this point. By prioritizing this specific aspect, other equally important factors in the global economy might be downplayed, creating a potentially misleading emphasis.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and factual, presenting data and analysis in an objective manner. However, phrases like "alarmas sobre la evolución de la economía mundial" (alarms about the evolution of the global economy) could be perceived as slightly sensationalistic. While not overtly biased, the overall tone subtly leans toward a negative outlook on the US economy.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the US economy and its consumption, neglecting a detailed examination of other significant global economic factors that might influence the overall picture. While acknowledging the importance of US consumption, the piece omits discussion of potential counterbalancing forces or growth in other major economies, potentially creating a skewed view of global economic trends. The impact of geopolitical events beyond US trade policy is also largely absent.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of the relationship between US economic policy and global stability, suggesting a direct correlation between US economic health and global financial stability. It doesn't fully explore other potential contributors to global financial instability, such as the interconnectedness of global financial markets or other macroeconomic variables.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the widening gap between the rich and poor in the US, with the negative impact of financial market corrections disproportionately affecting households with less financial security. This exacerbates existing inequalities and hinders progress towards equitable wealth distribution.