taz.de
WEF Barometer Shows Decline in Global Cooperation
The World Economic Forum's 2024 Global Cooperation Barometer, released January 2024, shows a slight overall decline in global cooperation due to increased conflicts (Ukraine, Middle East, Sudan) and decreased cross-border trade (-8%), although some progress was seen in climate funding and global health.
- How do the specific examples of decreased international trade and the rise of new alliances illustrate shifts in the global order?
- The WEF's report highlights a weakening of multilateral organizations like the UN and a shifting global order, with new alliances like the BRICS nations emerging. The decrease in cross-border trade reflects a potential retreat from globalization, while progress in climate funding and health indicators offers a mixed picture of international cooperation. The overall barometer shows minimal change, indicating a complex and evolving geopolitical landscape.
- What are the most significant negative trends revealed by the WEF's Global Cooperation Barometer, and what are their immediate impacts?
- The World Economic Forum's (WEF) Global Cooperation Barometer shows a decline in international cooperation, particularly in peace and security, and international trade. The index, based on data until the end of 2023, reveals a 3% decrease in the peace and security sub-index due to conflicts in Ukraine, the Middle East, and Sudan, and an 8% decrease in cross-border trade due to factors including China's economic slowdown and US-China trade barriers. However, some progress was noted in climate policy and global health.
- What are the potential long-term economic and political consequences of the observed fragmentation of international cooperation, and how might different actors adapt?
- The WEF's recommendation for governments to form "flexible, dynamic partnerships" and for businesses to consider "structural segmentation" suggests a response to the fragmentation of the global order. This potential shift away from traditional globalization could lead to regionalized economic blocs and a less integrated world economy, potentially impacting global supply chains and economic growth. The report's data underscores the need for adaptable strategies to navigate this uncertainty.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The report's framing emphasizes the negative aspects of declining global cooperation, particularly the increase in wars and the decrease in international trade. While acknowledging some positive developments in climate action and global health, the overall tone leans towards a pessimistic view of the current international order. The headline, while not explicitly provided, could further reinforce this negative framing. The use of terms like "damaged," "decreasing influence," and "hindrances" contributes to this negative framing. The analogy to a "jungle" paints a rather bleak picture of the future world order.
Language Bias
While largely neutral in its reporting of facts, the text uses loaded language to describe certain trends. For example, describing the decrease in international trade as a decline in "cooperation" implies a negative judgment, suggesting that trade inherently equates to cooperation. Similarly, describing the international situation as potentially turning into a 'jungle' conveys a strong negative connotation. More neutral phrasing could be: instead of 'damaged' use 'impaired', instead of 'decreasing influence' use 'reduced influence', instead of 'hindrances' use 'obstacles'.
Bias by Omission
The WEF report focuses on specific indicators (41 political, economic, and social indicators) but doesn't explicitly mention what other relevant factors might have been omitted. The analysis might benefit from mentioning potential biases stemming from the WEF's own interests as a Davos-based organization representing large corporations. This could lead to an underreporting of issues impacting smaller businesses or developing nations. The report acknowledges some positive trends in climate and health but doesn't discuss potential negative impacts related to these areas, such as environmental injustices or health disparities.
False Dichotomy
The report presents a somewhat dichotomous view by highlighting both decline in global cooperation in some areas (war, trade) and progress in others (climate, health). While acknowledging both sides, it doesn't thoroughly explore the complex interplay between these factors and how progress in one area might impact another, such as the economic implications of climate action or the health effects of conflict. The suggestion of 'flexible, dynamic partnerships' and 'structural segmentation' also implies a false dichotomy between global cooperation and regionalization, neglecting the possibility of more nuanced approaches.
Sustainable Development Goals
The report highlights a decline in the global cooperation index, particularly in peace and security, due to conflicts in Ukraine, the Middle East, and Sudan. This negatively impacts the UN's influence and multilateral organizations, hindering progress towards peaceful and inclusive societies.