Weight Regain After Stopping Weight-Loss Injections: An Oxford Study

Weight Regain After Stopping Weight-Loss Injections: An Oxford Study

kathimerini.gr

Weight Regain After Stopping Weight-Loss Injections: An Oxford Study

A University of Oxford study reveals that individuals using weight-loss injections regain a significant portion of lost weight within 10 months of stopping treatment, regardless of the injection type; newer, more effective drugs lead to greater weight loss but also greater weight regain.

Greek
Greece
HealthLifestyleObesityWeight LossSemaglutideGlp-1TirzepatideWeight Loss InjectionsMicrodosing
University Of Oxford
Maria S.Monica MathiopoulouEmilia Papakonstantinou
How do the effects of older and newer weight-loss injections differ in terms of weight regain after treatment cessation?
The Oxford study highlights the importance of lifestyle changes alongside medication for sustainable weight loss. While injections effectively suppress appetite and promote weight loss, their cessation often leads to weight regain due to the return of normal hunger sensations. This underscores the need for comprehensive weight management programs.
What are the long-term effects of stopping weight-loss injections on individuals who have lost significant weight using these medications?
A study by the University of Oxford, presented at the European Congress on Obesity, found that individuals using weight-loss injections (GLP-1) regained most of the weight lost within 10 months of stopping treatment. Those using newer, higher-efficacy drugs like semaglutide and tirzepatide lost double the weight (16kg on average) but regained 9.6kg within a year.
What strategies could be implemented to mitigate the risk of weight regain after discontinuing weight-loss injections, and what role might microdosing play?
The risk of weight regain after stopping weight-loss injections emphasizes the need for long-term strategies combining medication, dietary changes, and exercise. Future research should focus on developing strategies for maintaining weight loss post-treatment, potentially including microdosing or extended medication use. The study's findings indicate that while these injections are effective for short-term weight loss, they are not a standalone solution for long-term weight management.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the narrative around the potential drawbacks and challenges associated with weight loss injections, emphasizing the weight regain phenomenon and the difficulties individuals face after stopping treatment. While this is a valid concern, the article's focus might unintentionally create a negative perception of these medications, overshadowing their potential benefits for certain individuals struggling with obesity. The headline and introductory paragraphs subtly suggest that the injections are not a sustainable solution, potentially influencing the reader's interpretation.

2/5

Language Bias

The language used is generally neutral, but terms like "φυσούσε" (was blowing) used to describe Maria's surprise at her success could be interpreted as slightly sensationalist. The phrases describing the return of hunger, such as "the feeling of hunger returned fatally," could be considered somewhat dramatic. More neutral alternatives could be used to maintain objectivity.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses primarily on the weight regain experienced by individuals after stopping weight-loss injections, neglecting to explore alternative methods for long-term weight management or the potential benefits of these medications in conjunction with lifestyle changes. While the article mentions the importance of a holistic approach involving specialists and exercise, it doesn't delve into the details of these alternative strategies, limiting the reader's understanding of sustainable weight loss.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between weight loss with injections and the inevitable weight regain after stopping them. It doesn't fully explore the nuances of individual responses, the role of adherence to lifestyle changes, or the possibility of maintaining some weight loss even after discontinuing the injections. The implication is that the injections are either entirely effective or entirely ineffective, overlooking the spectrum of outcomes.

1/5

Gender Bias

The article uses a female case study (Maria S.) to illustrate the experience with weight-loss injections. While this is not inherently biased, the article could benefit from including male perspectives to ensure balanced representation. Furthermore, the language used is gender-neutral, avoiding any gender stereotypes.

Sustainable Development Goals

Good Health and Well-being Positive
Direct Relevance

The article discusses weight-loss injections and their impact on individuals. While showing positive short-term results, it highlights the importance of long-term lifestyle changes and monitoring to maintain weight loss and overall well-being. The risk of weight regain after stopping the injections underscores the need for comprehensive approaches to health, combining medication with dietary and lifestyle adjustments. This aligns with SDG 3, which aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.