euronews.com
"Wicked" Movie Review
A review of the movie adaptation of "Wicked," highlighting its impressive visuals but criticizing its pacing, excessive CGI, and overall length.
- What is the overall critical assessment of "Wicked" and its potential impact?
- While "Wicked" ultimately delivers on its musical numbers and emotional core, its flaws prevent it from being a truly exceptional cinematic experience, making it more suitable as a two-part release.
- What are the main strengths and weaknesses of the movie adaptation of "Wicked"?
- The movie adaptation of the Broadway musical "Wicked" is a visually impressive but overlong film that, while entertaining, suffers from pacing issues and excessive CGI.
- How does the film compare to other recent cinematic events, such as "Barbenheimer"?
- Despite strong performances from Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande, "Wicked" feels bloated and could have benefited from a more concise narrative, especially in its first act.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The review frames "Wicked" primarily through the lens of its shortcomings in comparison to "Barbenheimer", potentially influencing readers' perception of the film's overall quality.
Language Bias
The review uses descriptive language that leans towards criticism, such as "garishly bloated," "wonky CGI," and "lethargic first hour." This language subtly influences readers towards a negative interpretation.
Bias by Omission
The review focuses heavily on the film's flaws while mentioning its positive aspects less prominently. It omits discussion of potential audience reception beyond the reviewer's own opinion and doesn't explore alternative critical perspectives.
False Dichotomy
The review implicitly presents a false dichotomy by suggesting that the film's success hinges solely on its ability to replicate the "Barbenheimer" phenomenon, neglecting other potential factors contributing to box office performance.