faz.net
Wirecard Lawsuit: Court Rejects EY's Inclusion
The Bavarian Supreme Regional Court rejected the inclusion of EY, Wirecard's auditor, in a large-scale investor lawsuit due to the absence of a direct link between the audit report and public market information, shifting responsibility to Wirecard, leaving individual lawsuits as the only remaining recourse for investors.
- What are the immediate implications of the Bavarian Supreme Regional Court's decision regarding the inclusion of EY in the Wirecard investor lawsuit?
- The Bavarian Supreme Regional Court rejected the attempts to include claims against EY, Wirecard's auditor, in a large-scale investor lawsuit. The court argued that a direct link between EY's audit report and public capital market information was missing, placing responsibility for publication on Wirecard itself. This decision significantly weakens the investor lawsuit, limiting potential for damage compensation from EY.
- How does the court's interpretation of the Musterverfahrensgesetz affect the legal avenues available to Wirecard investors seeking compensation, and why?
- The ruling hinges on the old version of the German Musterverfahrensgesetz (model proceedings act), which the court deemed applicable to the Wirecard case. The court emphasized that while EY's audit report is important to investors, the responsibility for its public dissemination rested with Wirecard. This legal interpretation severely restricts avenues for investors seeking compensation from EY in this specific class action.
- What are the long-term implications of this ruling on investor protection, auditor liability, and the pursuit of justice in complex financial fraud cases?
- This decision highlights the complexities of holding auditors liable for financial reporting issues. While EY's failure to detect Wirecard's fraud resulted in significant financial losses and regulatory penalties, this ruling emphasizes the limited legal recourse for investors within the framework of this particular class-action suit. The ruling's impact underscores the importance of scrutinizing legal frameworks governing auditor liability and investor recourse in cases of financial fraud.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing subtly favors EY by focusing on its post-scandal actions and future business opportunities. While mentioning the class-action suit's setbacks, this positive framing of EY's recovery appears disproportionate to the gravity of their involvement in the Wirecard collapse. The headline and introduction could be rewritten to give more balanced weight to the victims and the severity of the scandal.
Language Bias
The article uses relatively neutral language but occasionally employs terms that slightly favor one side. For instance, describing the court decision as "taking the wind out of the sails" of the class-action suit subtly leans toward a negative portrayal of the plaintiffs' position. More neutral phrasing such as "significantly impacting the class-action suit" would improve neutrality. Similarly, the description of EY 'running warm' for new business after the ban could be perceived as positive, suggesting eagerness and preparation rather than merely a return to business.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the legal proceedings and EY's actions, but omits discussion of potential systemic failures within Wirecard itself or regulatory oversight failures that might have contributed to the scandal. While acknowledging space constraints is valid, omitting these perspectives might give a skewed impression of responsibility.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by emphasizing the limited success of the class-action suit against EY, while simultaneously highlighting EY's future business prospects. This might unintentionally lead readers to assume that EY's legal issues are essentially resolved, overshadowing the severity of the original accounting scandal.
Sustainable Development Goals
The ruling against EY in the Wirecard case limits avenues for investors to seek compensation for losses, potentially exacerbating existing inequalities between large corporations and individual investors. The fact that EY, despite its role in the Wirecard scandal, is already securing new clients before the end of its suspension highlights the uneven playing field.