WTO Predicts Global Trade Decline Due to Trump's Tariffs

WTO Predicts Global Trade Decline Due to Trump's Tariffs

gr.euronews.com

WTO Predicts Global Trade Decline Due to Trump's Tariffs

The World Trade Organization (WTO) forecasts a 0.2% decline in global goods trade volume in 2024 due to President Trump's tariffs and trade disputes; however, a 1.5% decrease is projected if harsher tariffs are implemented, severely impacting North America's exports (down 12.6%) and imports (down 9.6%).

Greek
United States
International RelationsEconomyTariffsGlobal TradeEconomic UncertaintyUs Trade PolicyWto
World Trade Organization (Wto)
Donald TrumpNgozi Okonjo-IwealaRalph Ossa
How do the projected impacts of President Trump's trade policies on North American exports and imports compare to the global projection?
The WTO's downward revision of global trade growth projections from continuous expansion in 2025-2026 stems directly from President Trump's trade war. Uncertainty caused by fluctuating tariff policies negatively impacts businesses, hindering global growth and disproportionately affecting vulnerable economies.
What is the WTO's projection for global goods trade volume in 2024, and how significantly would this projection change with the implementation of President Trump's harshest tariffs?
The World Trade Organization (WTO) projects a 0.2% decrease in global goods trade volume this year due to President Trump's changing tariff policies and the US-China trade dispute. This decrease would worsen to 1.5% if harsher retaliatory tariffs are implemented, significantly impacting North America with a projected 12.6% export and 9.6% import decline.
What are the long-term economic consequences of the uncertainty generated by fluctuating US trade policies, and how might this disproportionately affect specific regions or countries?
The ongoing US trade disputes, particularly with China, Canada, and Mexico, create persistent uncertainty that acts as a brake on global economic activity. The WTO's analysis highlights the far-reaching, often unpredictable consequences of tariffs, underscoring the need for clear and consistent trade policies.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The framing emphasizes the negative consequences of President Trump's trade policies, presenting them as the primary driver of the global trade slowdown. This perspective could be considered biased, as it downplays other potential contributing factors.

2/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and factual, relying on data and quotes from officials. However, the repeated emphasis on President Trump's policies and the use of phrases like "serious negative consequences" could subtly influence the reader's interpretation.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The analysis focuses heavily on the impact of President Trump's tariffs and the US's trade disputes, potentially overlooking other contributing factors to the global trade slowdown. While the report mentions broader trade tensions, it doesn't deeply explore them. The impact on vulnerable economies is mentioned, but specific examples are lacking.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The analysis presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the current situation and a hypothetical scenario with stricter tariffs. The nuances of global trade and the multifaceted nature of the economic challenges are not fully explored.

Sustainable Development Goals

Decent Work and Economic Growth Negative
Direct Relevance

The trade war between the US and China, and resulting tariffs, are projected to decrease global trade volume, impacting economic growth and potentially leading to job losses. The uncertainty caused by fluctuating trade policies also discourages investment and hinders economic activity. This directly affects SDG 8, which promotes sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all.