liberation.fr
WTO Revises 2025 Global Trade Forecast Downward Due to US Trade Policies
The WTO revised its forecast for global merchandise trade in 2025 downward to a 0.2% contraction from previous estimates, primarily due to the US-China trade war. However, a temporary suspension of some US tariffs lessened the impact, although considerable uncertainty remains, threatening vulnerable economies.
- How does the WTO's revised forecast differ from previous predictions, and what are the primary reasons for this change?
- WTO's revised prediction reflects a less negative outlook than earlier forecasts, primarily due to the temporary easing of trade tensions between the US and China. However, persistent uncertainty remains, threatening global growth and impacting most severely the most vulnerable economies. This revised forecast incorporates the temporary suspension of some US tariffs.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of continued trade uncertainty and policy unpredictability on global economic growth and vulnerable economies?
- The WTO's analysis highlights the significant impact of trade policy uncertainty on global commerce. While a temporary easing of tensions has reduced the predicted decline in trade, the risk of further escalation remains. The potential for a more substantial decline (1.5%) underscores the need for stable trade policies to support global economic growth and protect vulnerable nations. The report also highlights a significant shift in trade flows, with China expected to see increased exports to regions outside North America.
- What is the WTO's current forecast for the impact of the US-China trade war on global merchandise trade volume in 2025, and what factors influenced this forecast?
- The World Trade Organization (WTO) forecasts a 0.2% decrease in global merchandise trade volume in 2025, primarily due to the impact of Donald Trump's trade war. However, this is a less severe prediction than previously anticipated, thanks to the temporary suspension of some punitive tariffs. The WTO warns of potential negative consequences, particularly for vulnerable economies.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the trade war primarily as a negative event, highlighting the warnings and concerns of the WTO director-general. While presenting some data on potential economic consequences, the emphasis remains on the potential harm. Headlines and introductory paragraphs focus on the negative impact on global trade, reinforcing a negative perspective. The choice to lead with the negative consequences could shape public understanding toward viewing Trump's trade policies negatively.
Language Bias
The language used is relatively neutral, using descriptive terms like "slightly slowed" and "recession." However, phrases like "severe negative consequences" and "colossal tariffs" carry negative connotations and could influence reader perception. More neutral alternatives would be 'significant negative impacts' and 'substantial tariffs'. The repeated emphasis on negative impacts contributes to an overall negative tone.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the impact of Trump's trade war on global trade, particularly the potential negative consequences for vulnerable economies. However, it omits discussion of potential benefits or alternative perspectives on the trade war's effects. For example, it doesn't explore arguments that the trade war might stimulate domestic production in certain countries or lead to the creation of new trade relationships. The omission of these counterarguments might lead to a biased understanding of the issue.
False Dichotomy
The analysis presents a somewhat simplified view of the situation, focusing primarily on the negative impacts of the trade war. While acknowledging the temporary alleviation of tensions, it doesn't fully explore the nuances of the situation or the potential for long-term positive effects from trade adjustments. The framing implies a direct causal link between the trade war and negative consequences without fully exploring other contributing factors.
Sustainable Development Goals
The trade war initiated by Donald Trump caused a slowdown in global trade, potentially leading to job losses and reduced economic growth, especially in vulnerable economies. The uncertainty surrounding trade policies further hinders economic progress and negatively impacts businesses and employment.