french.china.org.cn
Xi Reasserts Commitment to Stable China-US Relations at APEC Summit
At the APEC summit in Lima, President Xi Jinping reaffirmed China's dedication to stable US-China relations based on mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win-win cooperation, rejecting great power competition and emphasizing the importance of people-to-people ties.
- What is the core message from President Xi Jinping regarding China-US relations?
- During the APEC summit in Lima, President Xi Jinping reiterated China's commitment to stable China-US relations, emphasizing mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win-win cooperation. He affirmed China's unchanging position on sovereignty and development interests, while highlighting the importance of traditional friendship between the two peoples.
- How does China's proposed approach to US relations differ from the current global geopolitical climate?
- Xi's statements reflect China's long-standing approach to US relations, prioritizing dialogue and cooperation to manage differences. He explicitly rejected the idea of great power competition as either timely or a solution to global challenges, instead advocating for a stable and constructive relationship.
- What are the potential long-term consequences if the US does not adopt a cooperative approach with China?
- China's stance underscores the growing global need for stable China-US relations amidst multiple crises. Xi's rejection of decoupling and warnings against using national security to suppress China's development highlight potential future conflict points if the US does not reciprocate China's commitment to cooperation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently favors China's viewpoint. The repeated emphasis on China's unchanging commitment to stable relations, its adherence to peaceful coexistence, and the US's potential for self-harm through conflict positions China as the reasonable party seeking cooperation. The use of metaphors like 'two enormous ships' further reinforces this narrative, implying that the US holds more responsibility for maintaining a positive relationship.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral but contains some subtly loaded terms. Phrases such as 'the US's potential for self-harm,' 'coercition of a so-called "position of strength,"' and 'Washington's attempt to excessively expand the concept of national security' subtly position the US negatively. More neutral language could be used, for example, focusing on specific policy disagreements rather than making value judgments.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on China's perspective and proposed solutions, omitting potential counterarguments or perspectives from the US side. While acknowledging the limitations of space, a more balanced inclusion of US viewpoints would enhance the analysis's objectivity. The piece also omits discussion of specific policy disagreements beyond general mentions of differing interests.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the relationship as either 'stable and constructive' or 'conflictual and decoupled,' neglecting the possibility of a complex relationship with both cooperation and competition. The suggestion that decoupling is not a viable option ignores potential scenarios where specific aspects of the relationship may be decoupled while others remain cooperative.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the importance of stable and constructive Sino-US relations for global peace and stability. Both countries are urged to prioritize dialogue, cooperation, and mutual respect to avoid conflict and contribute to a more peaceful world order. The rejection of decoupling and the emphasis on win-win cooperation directly support this SDG.