edition.cnn.com
Xi's Absence Marks 2024 BRICS Summit
The 2024 BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro is underway, but without Chinese President Xi Jinping, who is represented by Li Qiang, his second-in-command. This absence, along with Vladimir Putin's remote participation, shifts focus to other members amidst global economic uncertainty and increasing efforts towards de-dollarization.
- What are the immediate implications of Chinese President Xi Jinping's absence from the 2024 BRICS summit in Brazil?
- The 2024 BRICS summit in Brazil is notable for the absence of Chinese President Xi Jinping, who is instead represented by his No. 2 official, Li Qiang. This is the first time in over a decade Xi has missed the annual summit, occurring amidst global economic uncertainty and trade tensions with the US. The summit also sees the participation of several new members, including Indonesia, Iran, and potentially Saudi Arabia.
- How does Xi Jinping's absence, along with Vladimir Putin's remote participation, impact the dynamics and priorities of the BRICS summit?
- Xi's absence is significant because it represents a missed opportunity to project China's image as a stable global leader, particularly given the current US administration's 'America First' approach and its recent joint military action with Israel. However, experts suggest this doesn't diminish China's commitment to BRICS, viewing it as a key element in its strategy to counterbalance Western power. The absence of both Xi and Putin, who will participate via video link, due to legal concerns in Brazil, shifts focus to other leaders like Indian Prime Minister Modi.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of the BRICS summit's discussions on de-dollarization and the use of national currencies for trade, considering the absence of key leaders and the global geopolitical context?
- The summit's focus on reducing reliance on the US dollar for trade and finance within BRICS, particularly appealing to sanctioned members like Russia and Iran, will be closely watched. Xi's absence may reflect a prioritization of domestic economic challenges and the upcoming political conclave within China. The outcome of discussions on de-dollarization and the development of alternative payment systems within BRICS could significantly impact global financial dynamics.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Xi Jinping's absence as the central narrative, emphasizing its significance for BRICS's image and goals. While this is a valid point, the emphasis overshadows other crucial aspects of the summit, such as the participation of other leaders and the complexities of the issues being discussed. The headline itself highlights Xi's absence, setting the tone for the entire piece. The repeated focus on Xi's absence and its implications for China's image projects a certain narrative that may overshadow other significant events or perspectives during the summit.
Language Bias
The article mostly maintains a neutral tone, using objective language to describe events. However, phrases like "Global South's answer to the G7" might subtly frame BRICS in a competitive or oppositional context. The description of Trump's actions as "upending American trade relations" and his policies as "America First" are loaded terms that convey a negative connotation. More neutral phrasing could include "restructuring American trade relations" and "a focus on domestic priorities.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the absence of Xi Jinping and Putin, but offers limited analysis on the perspectives and potential impacts from other BRICS leaders. While mentioning Modi and Ramaphosa's attendance, it lacks detailed exploration of their agendas or potential influence on the summit's outcomes. The article also omits discussion of the internal dynamics and potential disagreements among BRICS nations regarding economic policies and geopolitical stances. The lack of specifics on the agendas of other member states beyond mentions of Indonesia and Saudi Arabia's potential participation represents a significant omission.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the BRICS nations' desire for a multipolar world and the US's influence. It implies that BRICS's efforts are primarily aimed at counterbalancing Western power, overlooking the internal complexities and diverse interests within the group. The portrayal of de-dollarization as a unifying goal for all members oversimplifies the varied economic situations and potential conflicts of interest. The discussion about a potential "BRICS currency" also lacks nuance, focusing primarily on Trump's reaction rather than a balanced assessment of the idea's feasibility and potential consequences within the group.
Sustainable Development Goals
The BRICS summit aims to create a multipolar world with more distributed power, potentially reducing the dominance of Western economies and promoting fairer global economic relations. The push for de-dollarization and the use of national currencies could empower developing nations and lessen reliance on the US dollar, which could lead to a more equitable global financial system. However, the effectiveness of this remains to be seen given the diverse interests within BRICS.