nrc.nl
Xi's Russia Visit Highlights Strengthening Sino-Russian Alliance
Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to Russia, his third since the 2022 Ukraine invasion, underscores the strengthening Sino-Russian alliance, with bilateral trade reaching €216 billion in 2024, and both countries drawing parallels between the fight against fascism and current geopolitical tensions.
- How does the increased trade between China and Russia, particularly in energy and dual-use goods, impact the geopolitical landscape?
- The deepening relationship between China and Russia is showcased by their parallel narratives framing the current geopolitical situation as a struggle against Western hegemony, echoing the narrative of the fight against fascism in 1945. This shared perspective is solidified by increased trade between the two nations, reaching approximately €216 billion in 2024—a 66 percent increase since 2021. China's significant purchase of Russian oil and gas, along with trade in dual-use goods, underlines China's crucial support for Russia despite its official neutrality in the Ukraine conflict.
- What are the immediate implications of Xi Jinping's visit to Russia and his statements regarding the relationship between China and Russia?
- During his visit to Russia, Chinese leader Xi Jinping emphasized the strong ties between the two countries, comparing their camaraderie to the power of the Yellow River and the Volga. This visit, Xi's third since the start of the Ukraine conflict, coincides with Russia's Victory Day parade, commemorating the Soviet Union's victory over Nazi Germany in 1945. Xi's statement highlights a shared view of the current global landscape, characterized as threatened by unilateralism and hegemony, implicitly referencing the United States.
- What are the long-term consequences of the increasingly close alignment between China and Russia, especially concerning Taiwan and the global balance of power?
- Xi Jinping's article, published in Rossijskaja Gazeta, omits mention of Ukraine but emphasizes China's stance on Taiwan's reunification, portraying it as an inevitable historical trend. This statement, coupled with Russia's support for China's 'One China' principle, underscores the growing alignment of interests between Moscow and Beijing, presenting a significant challenge to the existing global order. This strengthened alliance could result in increased geopolitical instability and further complicate international relations.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently favors the China-Russia perspective. The article highlights Xi Jinping's statements and uses language that mirrors Russia's narrative regarding Ukraine. Headlines and introductory paragraphs could have balanced this by including perspectives from Ukraine and other affected parties, but they emphasize the close ties between China and Russia. The choice to feature Xi's article prominently, and then Lavrov's statements, reinforces this bias.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language, particularly in its description of Russia's justifications for the invasion of Ukraine ('neonazi regime'). While it quotes Xi Jinping's milder criticisms of 'unilateralism, hegemony, bullying, and coercion', the article itself amplifies the comparison with Nazi Germany by presenting Lavrov's statements. More neutral alternatives would be to describe the situation in Ukraine without using loaded language, and to offer different interpretations of international relations rather than framing it as a simple conflict between two sides.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the China-Russia relationship and the historical context of WWII, but omits detailed discussion of Ukraine's perspective and the suffering caused by the ongoing conflict. The article also omits significant details about the nature and extent of China's support for Russia, beyond mentioning trade figures. While mentioning Taiwan's situation, it lacks in-depth analysis of Taiwanese perspectives and the potential consequences of China's assertive actions.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the geopolitical landscape as a struggle between a 'unilateralism, hegemony, bullying, and coercion' (implicitly referring to the US) and the alliance between China and Russia. This simplifies a complex situation, ignoring other actors and motivations.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the increasing tensions between China and Taiwan, and the support of Russia for China's claim on Taiwan. The strong military alliance between China and Russia, coupled with Russia's war in Ukraine, destabilizes the region and undermines international peace and security. China's assertive stance on Taiwan, supported by Russia, contradicts the principles of peaceful conflict resolution and respect for sovereignty, key aspects of SDG 16.