azatutyun.am
Yerevan Apartment Building Completion Delay Causes Resident Protest
Residents of a nearly complete 18-story apartment building at Mamikonyants 42/1 in Yerevan's Arabkir district are protesting a years-long delay in receiving completion documents from the developer, "Mamik," which sold the apartments through "Bars" real estate. The building, 95-98% finished, was promised for completion in November 2022 but remains unfinished, causing significant financial hardship for the 98 apartment owners.
- What immediate actions can Yerevan's city authorities take to resolve the Mamikonyants 42/1 apartment building completion delay and alleviate the hardship faced by residents?
- Residents of a Yerevan apartment building at Mamikonyants 42/1, unable to live in their purchased apartments due to the developer's delay in providing completion documents, are protesting. The building, 95-98% complete, has been stalled for years, despite promises of completion in November 2022 and later February 2023. Buyers are now facing a two-year delay.
- How did the roles of the developer ("Mamik"), the real estate agency ("Bars"), and the Yerevan Municipality contribute to the ongoing delays in completing the Mamikonyants 42/1 apartment building?
- The delay impacts 98 apartment owners, highlighting systemic issues in Yerevan's construction sector and the role of real estate agencies like "Bars," which sold the apartments based on unfulfilled promises. The developer, "Mamik" company, owned by Armen Hakobyan, son of a former MP, and "Bars" have not responded to requests for comment.
- What systemic changes are needed in the Armenian construction and real estate sectors to prevent similar situations from occurring in the future, protecting buyers from financial hardship due to developers' delays?
- This situation exposes vulnerabilities for buyers in the Armenian real estate market, emphasizing the need for stronger consumer protections and stricter enforcement of construction deadlines. The ongoing delays create significant financial hardship for buyers, many of whom are burdened by additional housing costs while waiting for access to their purchased apartments. The lack of response from the developer and the real estate agency underscores a broader problem of accountability within the industry.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing heavily favors the residents' perspective. The headline (which is not provided but can be inferred from the text) and introductory paragraphs likely emphasize their plight and frustration. The article structures the narrative chronologically, highlighting the prolonged delays and broken promises, building a case of injustice and mismanagement. While it mentions attempts to contact the other parties, the lack of their responses reinforces the residents' narrative as the dominant perspective.
Language Bias
While the article reports the residents' frustration, it largely avoids inflammatory language. Words like "frustration," "delays," and "broken promises" are neutral descriptors. However, using direct quotes containing words like "cheating" and "lying" might slightly skew the tone towards a negative representation of the developer.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the residents' complaints and perspectives, but lacks direct quotes or statements from the developer, "Mamik" company, or the real estate agency, "Bars." The reasons behind the delays are presented primarily through the residents' accounts and interpretations. While the article mentions attempts to contact these parties, their lack of response prevents a complete picture of the situation and potential counter-arguments. The article also doesn't explore alternative solutions or legal avenues the residents may pursue beyond appealing to the municipality.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified dichotomy: residents versus the developeagency. It doesn't explore the complexities of construction delays, regulatory hurdles, or potential financial issues impacting the project. The narrative focuses on the residents' frustration without fully acknowledging other contributing factors that might exist.
Sustainable Development Goals
The delay in delivering the apartments in the newly built building has caused significant distress to the residents. The situation highlights failures in urban planning and the protection of citizens' rights related to housing, which are directly related to Sustainable Cities and Communities. The residents have been waiting for years to move into their apartments, causing financial and emotional strain. This reflects poorly on the city's ability to provide adequate and timely housing for its citizens.