Showing 1 to 12 of 20 results


Supreme Court Weighs Presidential Power Over Independent Agencies
The Supreme Court temporarily allowed President Trump to fire Democrat-appointed members of independent agencies, leading to a legal challenge in Slaughter v. Trump that questions the precedent set by Humphrey's Executor v. United States and could significantly alter the balance of power between the...
Supreme Court Weighs Presidential Power Over Independent Agencies
The Supreme Court temporarily allowed President Trump to fire Democrat-appointed members of independent agencies, leading to a legal challenge in Slaughter v. Trump that questions the precedent set by Humphrey's Executor v. United States and could significantly alter the balance of power between the...
Progress
60% Bias Score


Trump Expands Executive Power, Challenging US Democratic Norms
President Trump's numerous executive actions, including military strikes without congressional approval, unilateral tariff imposition, and control over state National Guards, have significantly expanded presidential power, challenging traditional checks and balances and setting new norms for executi...
Trump Expands Executive Power, Challenging US Democratic Norms
President Trump's numerous executive actions, including military strikes without congressional approval, unilateral tariff imposition, and control over state National Guards, have significantly expanded presidential power, challenging traditional checks and balances and setting new norms for executi...
Progress
68% Bias Score


Trump's Emergency Powers: Legal Challenges and Calls for Reform
President Trump's frequent use of emergency powers, exceeding 150 legal provisions, has raised constitutional concerns, prompting legal challenges and bipartisan calls for reform to the National Emergencies Act of 1976, which lacks a clear definition of national emergency and effective checks on exe...
Trump's Emergency Powers: Legal Challenges and Calls for Reform
President Trump's frequent use of emergency powers, exceeding 150 legal provisions, has raised constitutional concerns, prompting legal challenges and bipartisan calls for reform to the National Emergencies Act of 1976, which lacks a clear definition of national emergency and effective checks on exe...
Progress
48% Bias Score


Trump's Presidency Tests U.S. Checks and Balances
President Trump's first 100 days in office tested the U.S. system of checks and balances through numerous executive orders, agency actions, and judicial criticism, prompting analysis of historical precedents and future implications for the separation of powers.
Trump's Presidency Tests U.S. Checks and Balances
President Trump's first 100 days in office tested the U.S. system of checks and balances through numerous executive orders, agency actions, and judicial criticism, prompting analysis of historical precedents and future implications for the separation of powers.
Progress
36% Bias Score


Trump Administration Weakens Checks on Executive Power
The Trump administration has weakened independent federal agencies acting as checks on executive power by firing officials, installing less-qualified replacements, and attempting to control agencies like the FEC, leading to concerns about accountability and potential misuse of power.
Trump Administration Weakens Checks on Executive Power
The Trump administration has weakened independent federal agencies acting as checks on executive power by firing officials, installing less-qualified replacements, and attempting to control agencies like the FEC, leading to concerns about accountability and potential misuse of power.
Progress
52% Bias Score


Trump, Musk Defy Congress, Threatening Democratic Institutions
President Trump and Elon Musk's defiance of Congress by misusing appropriated funds and dismantling government agencies, coupled with a judiciary's insufficient response, undermines the separation of powers and threatens democratic institutions, mirroring trends in Turkey, Hungary, and Poland.
Trump, Musk Defy Congress, Threatening Democratic Institutions
President Trump and Elon Musk's defiance of Congress by misusing appropriated funds and dismantling government agencies, coupled with a judiciary's insufficient response, undermines the separation of powers and threatens democratic institutions, mirroring trends in Turkey, Hungary, and Poland.
Progress
60% Bias Score

Supreme Court Curtails Universal Injunctions, Expanding its Authority
The Supreme Court's June 27th decision limits federal judges' use of universal injunctions against presidential decrees, expanding the Court's authority and raising concerns about the rule of law, according to dissenting justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Supreme Court Curtails Universal Injunctions, Expanding its Authority
The Supreme Court's June 27th decision limits federal judges' use of universal injunctions against presidential decrees, expanding the Court's authority and raising concerns about the rule of law, according to dissenting justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Progress
44% Bias Score

Trump's Emergency Powers: Exceeding Precedents and Threatening Checks and Balances
President Trump invoked emergency powers eight times in his first 100 days, exceeding all modern presidents; this pattern of bypassing Congress for domestic policy raises concerns about executive overreach and the erosion of democratic checks and balances, with implications for future administration...

Trump's Emergency Powers: Exceeding Precedents and Threatening Checks and Balances
President Trump invoked emergency powers eight times in his first 100 days, exceeding all modern presidents; this pattern of bypassing Congress for domestic policy raises concerns about executive overreach and the erosion of democratic checks and balances, with implications for future administration...
Progress
56% Bias Score

Trump's Executive Orders Face Legal Challenges in Federal Courts
President Trump's executive orders face numerous legal challenges in federal courts, with some resulting in temporary blocks. The legal battles highlight the U.S. system of checks and balances, involving potential appeals, congressional action, and judicial interpretations.

Trump's Executive Orders Face Legal Challenges in Federal Courts
President Trump's executive orders face numerous legal challenges in federal courts, with some resulting in temporary blocks. The legal battles highlight the U.S. system of checks and balances, involving potential appeals, congressional action, and judicial interpretations.
Progress
40% Bias Score

Trump Consolidates Executive Power, Challenging Checks and Balances
In his first 100 days, President Trump and his allies challenged the balance of power by consolidating executive control over various sectors, bypassing Congress and confronting judicial oversight, raising concerns about the future of American governance.

Trump Consolidates Executive Power, Challenging Checks and Balances
In his first 100 days, President Trump and his allies challenged the balance of power by consolidating executive control over various sectors, bypassing Congress and confronting judicial oversight, raising concerns about the future of American governance.
Progress
48% Bias Score

Greece's Independent Authorities: Unchecked Power and the Erosion of Democratic Accountability
This article by Thrasyvoulos Kontaxis, a lawyer and PhD in Law, critiques the lack of accountability and democratic oversight of Greece's Independent Authorities (A.A.s), arguing they represent a parallel, unchecked system that undermines democratic governance and the rule of law.

Greece's Independent Authorities: Unchecked Power and the Erosion of Democratic Accountability
This article by Thrasyvoulos Kontaxis, a lawyer and PhD in Law, critiques the lack of accountability and democratic oversight of Greece's Independent Authorities (A.A.s), arguing they represent a parallel, unchecked system that undermines democratic governance and the rule of law.
Progress
68% Bias Score

Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Trump's Firing of Independent Agency Head
The Supreme Court temporarily blocked President Trump's firing of Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel, until February 26, delaying a decision on the legality of the dismissal and raising questions about executive power over independent agencies. Four justices dissented.

Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Trump's Firing of Independent Agency Head
The Supreme Court temporarily blocked President Trump's firing of Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel, until February 26, delaying a decision on the legality of the dismissal and raising questions about executive power over independent agencies. Four justices dissented.
Progress
36% Bias Score
Showing 1 to 12 of 20 results