Tag #Dakota Access Pipeline

Showing 1 to 12 of 17 results

abcnews.go.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Apr 24, 04:10

Federal Judge Orders $28 Million Reimbursement to North Dakota for Dakota Access Pipeline Protest Costs

A federal judge ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to pay North Dakota nearly $28 million for policing the 2016-2017 Dakota Access Pipeline protests, citing the Corps' failure to follow mandated procedures and resulting harm to the state.

Federal Judge Orders $28 Million Reimbursement to North Dakota for Dakota Access Pipeline Protest Costs

A federal judge ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to pay North Dakota nearly $28 million for policing the 2016-2017 Dakota Access Pipeline protests, citing the Corps' failure to follow mandated procedures and resulting harm to the state.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What were the main arguments presented by both the state of North Dakota and the federal government during the trial?

The ruling stems from the Corps' failure to follow mandated procedures during the protests, leading to significant costs for North Dakota. The judge's decision emphasizes the federal government's responsibility for maintaining peace and order.

foxnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 04:13

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million Over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million in damages for its role in protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline, a verdict the environmental group plans to appeal, citing concerns about the chilling effect on free speech and environmental activism.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million Over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million in damages for its role in protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline, a verdict the environmental group plans to appeal, citing concerns about the chilling effect on free speech and environmental activism.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the $660 million verdict against Greenpeace, and how does this impact environmental activism?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million for its role in protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline. Greenpeace has been found liable for defamation, trespass, and other charges, with the damages distributed among three Greenpeace entities. The organization plans to appeal the verdict, calling the lawsuit an attempt to silence dissent.

tr.euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 16:13

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A US court ruled that Greenpeace must pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer for protests against the Dakota Access pipeline, which carries approximately 5% of the US's daily oil production; Greenpeace plans to appeal the decision.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A US court ruled that Greenpeace must pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer for protests against the Dakota Access pipeline, which carries approximately 5% of the US's daily oil production; Greenpeace plans to appeal the decision.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the primary impact of the court's decision on Greenpeace and environmental activism?

A US court ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, a pipeline company, for protests against the Dakota Access pipeline. The jury found Greenpeace USA primarily liable, with smaller portions assessed against related international and funding entities. Greenpeace plans to appeal.

euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 13:16

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Lawsuit

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer for actions related to protests against the Dakota Access pipeline's construction between 2016 and 2017, a decision Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Lawsuit

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer for actions related to protests against the Dakota Access pipeline's construction between 2016 and 2017, a decision Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate financial and operational consequences for Greenpeace resulting from the jury's decision in the Dakota Access Pipeline lawsuit?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access pipeline, for actions related to protests against the pipeline's construction. The damages are spread across three Greenpeace entities: Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace International, and Greenpeace Fund Inc., with Greenpeace USA bearing the largest share. Greenpeace plans to appeal the verdict.

cbsnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 07:13

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer over \$660 million for damages and defamation related to the 2016-2017 Standing Rock protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline; Greenpeace plans to appeal, citing concerns about free speech.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer over \$660 million for damages and defamation related to the 2016-2017 Standing Rock protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline; Greenpeace plans to appeal, citing concerns about free speech.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the absence of anti-SLAPP laws in North Dakota contribute to the outcome of this case?

The verdict connects to broader concerns about Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs), which aim to suppress free speech through expensive legal battles. North Dakota lacks anti-SLAPP laws, leaving Greenpeace vulnerable. The massive award—roughly ten times Greenpeace's US operating budget—raises concerns about the chilling effect on environmental activism.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 01:12

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $50 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Lawsuit

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $50 million for organizing 2016 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline near the Standing Rock Reservation, impacting Greenpeace's operations and raising concerns about free speech.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $50 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Lawsuit

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $50 million for organizing 2016 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline near the Standing Rock Reservation, impacting Greenpeace's operations and raising concerns about free speech.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the North Dakota jury's decision ordering Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $50 million in damages?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline, $50 million in damages for organizing protests against the pipeline near the Standing Rock Reservation in 2016. This ruling follows a lawsuit alleging defamation, trespass, and other acts by Greenpeace. The verdict has significant implications for environmental activism and freedom of speech.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 21, 13:14

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ruled that Greenpeace must pay Energy Transfer \$660 million for defamation and other claims stemming from 2016-2017 Dakota Access Pipeline protests, potentially emboldening other energy companies to sue environmental activists.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ruled that Greenpeace must pay Energy Transfer \$660 million for defamation and other claims stemming from 2016-2017 Dakota Access Pipeline protests, potentially emboldening other energy companies to sue environmental activists.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the long-term implications of this verdict for free speech, environmental activism, and the ability of organizations to challenge powerful corporations?

This verdict's impact extends beyond Greenpeace, potentially creating a chilling effect on environmental activism and free speech more broadly. The case raises concerns about the use of strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP suits) to silence dissent and disproportionately impact smaller organizations lacking the resources to fight lengthy legal battles. Future legal challenges to energy projects and other controversial initiatives may increase, leading to further restrictions on protest and advocacy.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 19:17

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Protest Case

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer \$660 million for its role in protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016-2017, prompting concerns about the weaponization of the legal system to silence dissent and restrict free speech.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Protest Case

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer \$660 million for its role in protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016-2017, prompting concerns about the weaponization of the legal system to silence dissent and restrict free speech.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the \$660 million verdict against Greenpeace, and how might it impact future environmental activism?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer \$660 million for defamation and other claims related to 2016-2017 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. This verdict has sparked concerns from advocacy groups about the weaponization of the legal system to silence dissent and restrict free speech.

nbcnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 13:16

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $660 million for actions taken to block the Dakota Access Pipeline's construction, prompting Greenpeace to announce an appeal and raising concerns about free speech.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $660 million for actions taken to block the Dakota Access Pipeline's construction, prompting Greenpeace to announce an appeal and raising concerns about free speech.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate financial and legal consequences for Greenpeace resulting from the jury's decision?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer, the Dakota Access Pipeline developer, over $660 million in damages. The verdict follows a lawsuit alleging Greenpeace's actions to impede pipeline construction caused significant harm. Greenpeace plans to appeal, citing concerns about free speech.

forbes.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 10:09

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury awarded Energy Transfer $660 million in damages from Greenpeace, concluding a lawsuit stemming from 2016-2017 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline's construction, which caused costly delays; Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury awarded Energy Transfer $660 million in damages from Greenpeace, concluding a lawsuit stemming from 2016-2017 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline's construction, which caused costly delays; Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate financial and legal implications of the $660 million verdict against Greenpeace for its role in the Dakota Access Pipeline protests?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $660 million for damages related to protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. The verdict followed a lawsuit alleging defamation, nuisance, and disruption of construction. This decision could have significant financial implications for Greenpeace.

theglobeandmail.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 04:12

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $666.9 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ruled that Greenpeace must pay Energy Transfer $666.9 million in damages for actions related to protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline's construction between 2016 and 2017, with Greenpeace USA bearing the largest portion of the fine, while Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $666.9 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ruled that Greenpeace must pay Energy Transfer $666.9 million in damages for actions related to protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline's construction between 2016 and 2017, with Greenpeace USA bearing the largest portion of the fine, while Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the $650 million verdict against Greenpeace, and how might this impact future environmental activism?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over $650 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access pipeline, for actions related to protests against its construction. Greenpeace has announced plans to appeal the verdict, emphasizing that its work will continue. The damages will be split among three Greenpeace entities.

welt.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 01:12

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay Hundreds of Millions in Damages over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

A North Dakota court ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer, the operator of the Dakota Access Pipeline, hundreds of millions of dollars in damages for protesting the pipeline's construction on land sacred to Sioux tribes, raising concerns about free speech and environmental activism.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay Hundreds of Millions in Damages over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

A North Dakota court ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer, the operator of the Dakota Access Pipeline, hundreds of millions of dollars in damages for protesting the pipeline's construction on land sacred to Sioux tribes, raising concerns about free speech and environmental activism.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term impacts of this legal decision on the balance between corporate interests, environmental advocacy, and indigenous rights in the US?

The ruling against Greenpeace could set a precedent impacting future environmental activism, potentially chilling protests against energy infrastructure projects. The substantial damages awarded could financially strain Greenpeace and raise questions about the limits of free speech in the context of corporate litigation. The case may encourage other companies to pursue similar lawsuits.

Showing 1 to 12 of 17 results