Tag #Environmental Activism

Showing 49 to 60 of 100 results

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 19:17

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Protest Case

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer \$660 million for its role in protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016-2017, prompting concerns about the weaponization of the legal system to silence dissent and restrict free speech.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Protest Case

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer \$660 million for its role in protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016-2017, prompting concerns about the weaponization of the legal system to silence dissent and restrict free speech.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the \$660 million verdict against Greenpeace, and how might it impact future environmental activism?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer \$660 million for defamation and other claims related to 2016-2017 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. This verdict has sparked concerns from advocacy groups about the weaponization of the legal system to silence dissent and restrict free speech.

euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 13:16

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Lawsuit

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer for actions related to protests against the Dakota Access pipeline's construction between 2016 and 2017, a decision Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Lawsuit

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer for actions related to protests against the Dakota Access pipeline's construction between 2016 and 2017, a decision Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate financial and operational consequences for Greenpeace resulting from the jury's decision in the Dakota Access Pipeline lawsuit?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access pipeline, for actions related to protests against the pipeline's construction. The damages are spread across three Greenpeace entities: Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace International, and Greenpeace Fund Inc., with Greenpeace USA bearing the largest share. Greenpeace plans to appeal the verdict.

cbsnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 07:13

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer over \$660 million for damages and defamation related to the 2016-2017 Standing Rock protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline; Greenpeace plans to appeal, citing concerns about free speech.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer over \$660 million for damages and defamation related to the 2016-2017 Standing Rock protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline; Greenpeace plans to appeal, citing concerns about free speech.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the absence of anti-SLAPP laws in North Dakota contribute to the outcome of this case?

The verdict connects to broader concerns about Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs), which aim to suppress free speech through expensive legal battles. North Dakota lacks anti-SLAPP laws, leaving Greenpeace vulnerable. The massive award—roughly ten times Greenpeace's US operating budget—raises concerns about the chilling effect on environmental activism.

theglobeandmail.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 04:12

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $666.9 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ruled that Greenpeace must pay Energy Transfer $666.9 million in damages for actions related to protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline's construction between 2016 and 2017, with Greenpeace USA bearing the largest portion of the fine, while Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $666.9 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ruled that Greenpeace must pay Energy Transfer $666.9 million in damages for actions related to protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline's construction between 2016 and 2017, with Greenpeace USA bearing the largest portion of the fine, while Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the $650 million verdict against Greenpeace, and how might this impact future environmental activism?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over $650 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access pipeline, for actions related to protests against its construction. Greenpeace has announced plans to appeal the verdict, emphasizing that its work will continue. The damages will be split among three Greenpeace entities.

welt.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 01:12

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay Hundreds of Millions in Damages over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

A North Dakota court ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer, the operator of the Dakota Access Pipeline, hundreds of millions of dollars in damages for protesting the pipeline's construction on land sacred to Sioux tribes, raising concerns about free speech and environmental activism.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay Hundreds of Millions in Damages over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

A North Dakota court ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer, the operator of the Dakota Access Pipeline, hundreds of millions of dollars in damages for protesting the pipeline's construction on land sacred to Sioux tribes, raising concerns about free speech and environmental activism.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term impacts of this legal decision on the balance between corporate interests, environmental advocacy, and indigenous rights in the US?

The ruling against Greenpeace could set a precedent impacting future environmental activism, potentially chilling protests against energy infrastructure projects. The substantial damages awarded could financially strain Greenpeace and raise questions about the limits of free speech in the context of corporate litigation. The case may encourage other companies to pursue similar lawsuits.

smh.com.au

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 13, 04:09

DiCaprio Condemns Jarrah Forest Clearing

South32 received approval to clear 39 square kilometers of jarrah forest near Boddington, WA, despite a 2024 ban on native forest logging; Leonardo DiCaprio's Instagram post brought global attention to the issue, highlighting the conflict between mining and environmental protection policies.

DiCaprio Condemns Jarrah Forest Clearing

South32 received approval to clear 39 square kilometers of jarrah forest near Boddington, WA, despite a 2024 ban on native forest logging; Leonardo DiCaprio's Instagram post brought global attention to the issue, highlighting the conflict between mining and environmental protection policies.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Life on Land

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did Leonardo DiCaprio's social media campaign impact public awareness and potential political responses to the jarrah forest clearing?

The conflict between mining interests and environmental protection is evident in Western Australia's policies, allowing native forest clearing for mining despite a logging ban. DiCaprio's advocacy amplified this issue, bringing international scrutiny to the situation and potentially influencing future policy decisions.

tr.euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 16:13

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A US court ruled that Greenpeace must pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer for protests against the Dakota Access pipeline, which carries approximately 5% of the US's daily oil production; Greenpeace plans to appeal the decision.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A US court ruled that Greenpeace must pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer for protests against the Dakota Access pipeline, which carries approximately 5% of the US's daily oil production; Greenpeace plans to appeal the decision.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the primary impact of the court's decision on Greenpeace and environmental activism?

A US court ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, a pipeline company, for protests against the Dakota Access pipeline. The jury found Greenpeace USA primarily liable, with smaller portions assessed against related international and funding entities. Greenpeace plans to appeal.

forbes.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 10:09

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury awarded Energy Transfer $660 million in damages from Greenpeace, concluding a lawsuit stemming from 2016-2017 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline's construction, which caused costly delays; Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury awarded Energy Transfer $660 million in damages from Greenpeace, concluding a lawsuit stemming from 2016-2017 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline's construction, which caused costly delays; Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate financial and legal implications of the $660 million verdict against Greenpeace for its role in the Dakota Access Pipeline protests?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $660 million for damages related to protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. The verdict followed a lawsuit alleging defamation, nuisance, and disruption of construction. This decision could have significant financial implications for Greenpeace.

foxnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 04:13

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million Over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million in damages for its role in protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline, a verdict the environmental group plans to appeal, citing concerns about the chilling effect on free speech and environmental activism.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million Over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million in damages for its role in protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline, a verdict the environmental group plans to appeal, citing concerns about the chilling effect on free speech and environmental activism.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the $660 million verdict against Greenpeace, and how does this impact environmental activism?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million for its role in protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline. Greenpeace has been found liable for defamation, trespass, and other charges, with the damages distributed among three Greenpeace entities. The organization plans to appeal the verdict, calling the lawsuit an attempt to silence dissent.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 01:12

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $50 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Lawsuit

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $50 million for organizing 2016 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline near the Standing Rock Reservation, impacting Greenpeace's operations and raising concerns about free speech.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $50 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Lawsuit

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $50 million for organizing 2016 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline near the Standing Rock Reservation, impacting Greenpeace's operations and raising concerns about free speech.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the North Dakota jury's decision ordering Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $50 million in damages?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline, $50 million in damages for organizing protests against the pipeline near the Standing Rock Reservation in 2016. This ruling follows a lawsuit alleging defamation, trespass, and other acts by Greenpeace. The verdict has significant implications for environmental activism and freedom of speech.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Mar 17, 13:15

Greenpeace Faces Multi-Million Dollar Lawsuit Over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

Energy Transfer is suing Greenpeace for hundreds of millions of dollars over protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline, a case with potential implications for free speech and protest rights; closing arguments are set for Monday.

Greenpeace Faces Multi-Million Dollar Lawsuit Over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

Energy Transfer is suing Greenpeace for hundreds of millions of dollars over protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline, a case with potential implications for free speech and protest rights; closing arguments are set for Monday.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the specific actions of Greenpeace, as alleged by Energy Transfer, contribute to the current legal dispute?

The lawsuit stems from Greenpeace's involvement in protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline between 2016 and 2017. Energy Transfer claims Greenpeace organized and funded the protests, provided supplies and training, and spread false information. Greenpeace denies these allegations, arguing the lawsuit is an attempt to suppress criticism and stifle free speech.

elpais.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 12, 13:11

Colombian Ancestral Mining Leader Assassinated

Jaime Gallego Gómez, a 57-year-old leader of Segovia's ancestral mining community, was found murdered in Vegachí, Colombia, on March 9th, 2025, six days after his disappearance. His death, attributed to the Clan del Golfo, highlights ongoing violence against social leaders advocating for ancestral m...

Colombian Ancestral Mining Leader Assassinated

Jaime Gallego Gómez, a 57-year-old leader of Segovia's ancestral mining community, was found murdered in Vegachí, Colombia, on March 9th, 2025, six days after his disappearance. His death, attributed to the Clan del Golfo, highlights ongoing violence against social leaders advocating for ancestral m...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the murder of Jaime Gallego Gómez on the fight for ancestral mining rights in Segovia, Colombia?

Jaime Gallego Gómez, known as "Mongo," a leader of Segovia's ancestral mining community in Colombia, was murdered on March 9th, 2025. His body was found in Vegachí, 55 kilometers from where he was last seen, after six days missing along with his bodyguard. He was the 33rd social leader murdered in Colombia this year.

Showing 49 to 60 of 100 results