Tag #Fossil Fuels

Showing 1 to 12 of 186 results

repubblica.it

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 9, 16:19

Germany's Green Energy Transition Stalls Amidst Renewable Energy Drop

Germany's renewable energy production plummeted 16% in early 2025 due to weak winds impacting wind power (-31%), forcing a 10% rise in fossil fuel use, primarily coal (+16%), resulting in higher CO2 emissions (nearly 42 million tons) and reversing its green transition.

Germany's Green Energy Transition Stalls Amidst Renewable Energy Drop

Germany's renewable energy production plummeted 16% in early 2025 due to weak winds impacting wind power (-31%), forcing a 10% rise in fossil fuel use, primarily coal (+16%), resulting in higher CO2 emissions (nearly 42 million tons) and reversing its green transition.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the impact of the significant decrease in Germany's renewable energy production during the first four months of 2025?

Germany's renewable energy production dropped 16% in the first four months of 2025, reaching its lowest point since 2015. This led to a 10% increase in fossil fuel production, raising its share in the electricity mix to the highest level since 2018. The main cause was a 31% decrease in wind power generation, despite a 30% increase in installed wind capacity since 2017.

lemonde.fr

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

May 7, 13:17

IEA Report: Record Methane Emissions from Fossil Fuels in 2024

The International Energy Agency (IEA) reported that the fossil fuel industry released over 120 million tonnes of methane in 2024, nearing a record high, with China, the US, and Russia as top emitters; the IEA emphasizes that curbing these emissions is crucial to limit global warming.

IEA Report: Record Methane Emissions from Fossil Fuels in 2024

The International Energy Agency (IEA) reported that the fossil fuel industry released over 120 million tonnes of methane in 2024, nearing a record high, with China, the US, and Russia as top emitters; the IEA emphasizes that curbing these emissions is crucial to limit global warming.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the main sources of methane emissions within the energy sector, and which countries are the largest contributors?

The IEA's report emphasizes that the energy sector accounts for roughly one-third of anthropogenic methane emissions, primarily due to leaks during extraction, production, and transport. China is the largest emitter, followed by the US and Russia. The report's data, based on measured emissions, is significantly higher than self-reported figures, highlighting the importance of improved monitoring and transparency.

fr.euronews.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

May 7, 16:13

EU Rejects Post-War Russian Fossil Fuel Imports

EU President von der Leyen ruled out resuming Russian fossil fuel imports after the Ukraine war, citing Russia's unreliability and the need for energy independence, despite continued LNG imports and US efforts to broker a peace deal involving potential energy concessions to Russia.

EU Rejects Post-War Russian Fossil Fuel Imports

EU President von der Leyen ruled out resuming Russian fossil fuel imports after the Ukraine war, citing Russia's unreliability and the need for energy independence, despite continued LNG imports and US efforts to broker a peace deal involving potential energy concessions to Russia.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Affordable and Clean Energy

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the EU's stance on resuming Russian fossil fuel imports after the Ukraine war, and what are the immediate implications?

Ursula von der Leyen firmly rejected resuming Russian fossil fuel purchases post-war, calling it a 'historic mistake.' The EU has drastically reduced Russian fossil fuel consumption, banning seaborne oil and coal. This follows reported US attempts to broker peace involving concessions to Russia.

tr.euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 6, 19:17

EU to Eliminate All Russian Fossil Fuel Imports by 2027

The European Union announced a plan to completely phase out all Russian fossil fuel imports by 2027, banning new short-term contracts by the end of 2025 and terminating long-term contracts by 2027, addressing concerns over energy security and funding Russia's war effort.

EU to Eliminate All Russian Fossil Fuel Imports by 2027

The European Union announced a plan to completely phase out all Russian fossil fuel imports by 2027, banning new short-term contracts by the end of 2025 and terminating long-term contracts by 2027, addressing concerns over energy security and funding Russia's war effort.

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the key challenges the EU faces in implementing its plan to phase out Russian fossil fuels?

This EU strategy reflects a shift away from dependence on Russian energy, driven by Russia's weaponization of gas supplies and the need to stop funding the Russian war effort. The phased approach acknowledges the complexities of existing contracts and national variations in energy dependence, while aiming for complete independence by 2027. This decision is also influenced by the ongoing war in Ukraine and the substantial financial support the EU provides to Ukraine, exceeding the amount spent on Russian fossil fuels in 2024.

cbsnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 2, 01:16

DOJ Sues Hawaii and Michigan, Blocking Climate Lawsuits Against Fossil Fuel Companies

The U.S. Justice Department filed lawsuits against Hawaii and Michigan, preemptively blocking their planned legal action against fossil fuel companies for climate change damages, citing conflict with federal authority and the Trump administration's energy agenda; legal experts call this unprecedente...

DOJ Sues Hawaii and Michigan, Blocking Climate Lawsuits Against Fossil Fuel Companies

The U.S. Justice Department filed lawsuits against Hawaii and Michigan, preemptively blocking their planned legal action against fossil fuel companies for climate change damages, citing conflict with federal authority and the Trump administration's energy agenda; legal experts call this unprecedente...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the arguments used by the DOJ to justify its lawsuits against Hawaii and Michigan?

The DOJ's lawsuits challenge the states' authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, arguing that the Clean Air Act grants the EPA this power. Hawaii and Michigan's lawsuits target fossil fuel companies for alleged climate-related harms, including Hawaii's 2023 Lahaina wildfire. The DOJ's action is aligned with the Trump administration's broader push to support the fossil fuel industry and limit environmental regulations.

forbes.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 2, 16:14

DOJ Sues Hawaii and Michigan to Block Climate Change Lawsuits

The U.S. Department of Justice filed lawsuits against Hawaii and Michigan to prevent them from suing fossil fuel companies for climate change damages, asserting federal authority under the Clean Air Act and arguing that state lawsuits would disrupt interstate commerce.

DOJ Sues Hawaii and Michigan to Block Climate Change Lawsuits

The U.S. Department of Justice filed lawsuits against Hawaii and Michigan to prevent them from suing fossil fuel companies for climate change damages, asserting federal authority under the Clean Air Act and arguing that state lawsuits would disrupt interstate commerce.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the DOJ's legal strategy connect to the Trump administration's broader energy and climate policy goals?

The DOJ's lawsuits reflect the Trump administration's broader energy and climate policy agenda, which seeks to reverse Biden-era policies and reduce regulatory hurdles for fossil fuel companies. The lawsuits target states like Hawaii (80% energy from oil/gas) and Michigan, preventing them from pursuing legal action against companies extracting and refining fossil fuels outside their borders. This strategy aims to slow down climate-related lawfare.

taz.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 9, 22:11

German Government Faces Climate Activist Backlash Over Fossil Fuel Prioritization

Fridays for Future" in Germany criticized the new government's climate policies, demanding stronger climate laws, immediate actions for transport and buildings, and a rapid gas phase-out, contrasting with the government's plans to expand gas power plants and abolish the climate envoy position.

German Government Faces Climate Activist Backlash Over Fossil Fuel Prioritization

Fridays for Future" in Germany criticized the new government's climate policies, demanding stronger climate laws, immediate actions for transport and buildings, and a rapid gas phase-out, contrasting with the government's plans to expand gas power plants and abolish the climate envoy position.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the German government's decision to eliminate the climate envoy position reflect its overall commitment to climate action?

The protest movement's actions highlight a growing conflict between climate activists and the German government's policies. The government's decision to eliminate the position of climate envoy and prioritize gas expansion demonstrates a lack of commitment to climate protection, directly undermining previous climate initiatives. This clash underscores the urgency of the climate crisis and the challenges in implementing effective climate policies in the face of political resistance.

dw.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

May 7, 13:17

EU Aims to Eliminate Russian Fossil Fuels by 2027 Amid Rising LNG Imports

The European Commission unveiled a plan to end all Russian fossil fuel imports to the EU by 2027, despite a recent 18% increase in Russian LNG imports in 2024, costing the EU €23 billion and highlighting challenges in achieving energy independence.

EU Aims to Eliminate Russian Fossil Fuels by 2027 Amid Rising LNG Imports

The European Commission unveiled a plan to end all Russian fossil fuel imports to the EU by 2027, despite a recent 18% increase in Russian LNG imports in 2024, costing the EU €23 billion and highlighting challenges in achieving energy independence.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Affordable and Clean Energy

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of the EU's plan to eliminate Russian fossil fuels by 2027, given the recent rise in Russian LNG imports?

The European Commission announced a plan to eliminate Russian fossil fuels from the EU energy mix by 2027, banning new contracts by 2025 and phasing out all imports by 2027. Despite a recent increase in Russian LNG imports (18% in 2024, costing the EU €23 billion), the plan aims to end this reliance. However, experts remain skeptical due to continued high imports and intra-EU divisions.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 7, 16:13

EU to Phase Out Remaining Russian Energy Imports by 2027

The European Commission unveiled a plan to phase out remaining Russian energy imports by 2027, employing legislation instead of sanctions due to Hungarian opposition, aiming to make Russian fuel economically unappealing and improve transparency.

EU to Phase Out Remaining Russian Energy Imports by 2027

The European Commission unveiled a plan to phase out remaining Russian energy imports by 2027, employing legislation instead of sanctions due to Hungarian opposition, aiming to make Russian fuel economically unappealing and improve transparency.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Affordable and Clean Energy

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

Why is the EU avoiding further sanctions on Russian energy, and what alternative approach is being used?

Russia's share of the EU energy market has significantly decreased since the war began, falling from 26% for oil to 3% and from 45% for gas to 19%. However, even this reduced supply generates substantial revenue for Russia, funding its war in Ukraine. The EU aims to make Russian fuel economically unattractive through new regulations, including transparency measures for gas contracts.

sueddeutsche.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 5, 16:13

ESMA's Sustainable Fund Rules Prompt Widespread Fund Renaming and Restructuring

Facing a May 21, 2025 deadline for new EU sustainable fund naming rules, major European fund companies like Union Investment, DWS, Allianz Global Investors, and Deka have renamed or adjusted dozens of funds to comply with stricter investment criteria, revealing discrepancies between marketing and ac...

ESMA's Sustainable Fund Rules Prompt Widespread Fund Renaming and Restructuring

Facing a May 21, 2025 deadline for new EU sustainable fund naming rules, major European fund companies like Union Investment, DWS, Allianz Global Investors, and Deka have renamed or adjusted dozens of funds to comply with stricter investment criteria, revealing discrepancies between marketing and ac...

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Responsible Consumption and Production

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the underlying causes of the discrepancies between the advertised ESG approaches of many funds and their actual investment practices?

This ESMA directive, effective November 2024 for new EU funds, prompted significant changes. Bloomberg reports that major fund companies renamed or adjusted dozens of funds, including Union Investment (rebranding 10 of 13 funds) and DWS (adjusting numerous ESG funds and renaming others, such as the "DWS Invest ESG Women for Women" fund). Allianz Global Investors and Deka also made similar changes.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 2, 01:16

US Justice Department Sues Hawaii and Michigan to Block Fossil Fuel Climate Lawsuits

The US Justice Department filed lawsuits against Hawaii and Michigan, preemptively blocking their planned legal action against fossil fuel companies for climate damages, arguing that state actions conflict with federal authority under the Clean Air Act and the Trump administration's energy agenda.

US Justice Department Sues Hawaii and Michigan to Block Fossil Fuel Climate Lawsuits

The US Justice Department filed lawsuits against Hawaii and Michigan, preemptively blocking their planned legal action against fossil fuel companies for climate damages, arguing that state actions conflict with federal authority under the Clean Air Act and the Trump administration's energy agenda.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the legal arguments used by the Justice Department to justify its preemptive lawsuits, and how do these arguments relate to the Trump administration's energy policy?

The lawsuits challenge states' rights to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for climate change impacts, exemplified by Hawaii's plan to address the Lahaina wildfire and Michigan's investigation into the industry's environmental harm. The Justice Department's actions align with the Trump administration's pro-fossil fuel energy agenda, prioritizing domestic energy security over state-level environmental regulations. This strategy could stifle climate action initiatives across the US.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 2, 10:12

DOJ Sues Four States Over Climate Actions

The U.S. Justice Department filed lawsuits against Hawaii, Michigan, New York, and Vermont, challenging their climate-related actions—including legal action against fossil fuel companies and climate superfund laws—as conflicting with federal authority and President Trump's energy agenda.

DOJ Sues Four States Over Climate Actions

The U.S. Justice Department filed lawsuits against Hawaii, Michigan, New York, and Vermont, challenging their climate-related actions—including legal action against fossil fuel companies and climate superfund laws—as conflicting with federal authority and President Trump's energy agenda.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the Justice Department's lawsuits against the four states regarding their climate actions?

The Justice Department sued four states this week, alleging their climate change initiatives contradict federal authority and the Trump administration's energy policy. These lawsuits target Hawaii and Michigan's planned legal action against fossil fuel companies and New York and Vermont's climate superfund laws, which would compel fossil fuel companies to contribute to state funds based on past greenhouse gas emissions. The DOJ argues that these state actions interfere with the Clean Air Act, which grants the EPA authority to set nationwide standards for greenhouse gas emissions.

Showing 1 to 12 of 186 results