Tag #Higgins

Showing 1 to 4 of 4 results

smh.com.au

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 21, 04:17

Lehrmann Appeals Rape Finding, Challenges Court's Definition

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a Federal Court ruling that found him liable for raping Brittany Higgins, arguing procedural unfairness and challenging the court's definition of rape; Lisa Wilkinson, who interviewed Higgins, also faces legal challenges.

Lehrmann Appeals Rape Finding, Challenges Court's Definition

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a Federal Court ruling that found him liable for raping Brittany Higgins, arguing procedural unfairness and challenging the court's definition of rape; Lisa Wilkinson, who interviewed Higgins, also faces legal challenges.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the key arguments in Bruce Lehrmann's appeal against the Federal Court's finding of rape, and what are the potential implications of this legal challenge?

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a Federal Court decision that found him liable for raping Brittany Higgins. The court found that Lehrmann's actions, including encouraging Higgins to drink and disregarding her consent, constituted recklessness. Lehrmann maintains his innocence and argues he was denied procedural fairness.

smh.com.au

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 20, 04:17

Lehrmann Appeals Defamation Ruling After Court Finds Rape

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a Federal Court decision that dismissed his defamation case against Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson following a finding that he raped Brittany Higgins; the appeal argues procedural unfairness due to discrepancies between court findings and broadcast allegations.

Lehrmann Appeals Defamation Ruling After Court Finds Rape

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a Federal Court decision that dismissed his defamation case against Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson following a finding that he raped Brittany Higgins; the appeal argues procedural unfairness due to discrepancies between court findings and broadcast allegations.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the Federal Court's finding of 'recklessness' regarding consent differ from the allegations presented, and what impact did this discrepancy have on Lehrmann's defense?

Lehrmann's appeal hinges on the assertion that he wasn't given a fair opportunity to respond to the specific version of events presented by the court. He claims the court's finding of a 'non-violent rape' differs from the 'violent rape' described in the broadcast, leading to procedural unfairness. This highlights the complexities of legal processes in high-profile cases and the potential for discrepancies in different standards of proof.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 21, 10:15

Lehrmann's Defamation Appeal: Court Rejects Adjournment Requests

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a defamation ruling against Lisa Wilkinson and Network 10 for a 2021 interview about Brittany Higgins' rape allegation, claiming the omission of his name was a strategic decision to increase ratings, and that his lawyer's multiple requests for adjournments were denied.

Lehrmann's Defamation Appeal: Court Rejects Adjournment Requests

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a defamation ruling against Lisa Wilkinson and Network 10 for a 2021 interview about Brittany Higgins' rape allegation, claiming the omission of his name was a strategic decision to increase ratings, and that his lawyer's multiple requests for adjournments were denied.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the key arguments in Bruce Lehrmann's defamation appeal, and what immediate implications could the ruling have on Australian media?

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a defamation ruling against Lisa Wilkinson and Network 10 stemming from a 2021 interview about Brittany Higgins' rape allegation. Lehrmann's lawyer repeatedly requested early adjournments due to insufficient preparation time, which the court denied, highlighting the lawyer's perceived ample preparation time. The appeal challenges the court's finding that Lehrmann wasn't given an opportunity to address the type of rape alleged.

smh.com.au

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 4, 22:09

Lehrmann Appeals Rape Conviction, Citing Discrepancies in Court Findings

A lawyer is appealing a court's finding that Bruce Lehrmann raped Brittany Higgins, arguing the court's findings differed from evidence presented and that Lehrmann was denied procedural fairness; the court found Lehrmann guilty but the description of the assault differed from media accounts.

Lehrmann Appeals Rape Conviction, Citing Discrepancies in Court Findings

A lawyer is appealing a court's finding that Bruce Lehrmann raped Brittany Higgins, arguing the court's findings differed from evidence presented and that Lehrmann was denied procedural fairness; the court found Lehrmann guilty but the description of the assault differed from media accounts.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How do discrepancies between the court's findings and the media's portrayal of the assault affect the legal arguments in Lehrmann's appeal?

The appeal focuses on discrepancies between the court's description of the rape and the account in a Network Ten interview. The lawyer argues the court created its own case theory, which was never presented to Lehrmann for response, thus violating his procedural fairness rights. This highlights concerns about the reliability of determining facts in complex sexual assault cases.

Showing 1 to 4 of 4 results