Tag #Media Law

Showing 1 to 12 of 21 results

npr.org

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 4, 16:19

Newsmax Sues Fox News for Antitrust Practices

Newsmax TV is suing Fox News, alleging anti-competitive practices to maintain dominance in the conservative media market, citing exclusion from subscription platforms like Hulu and Sling.

Newsmax Sues Fox News for Antitrust Practices

Newsmax TV is suing Fox News, alleging anti-competitive practices to maintain dominance in the conservative media market, citing exclusion from subscription platforms like Hulu and Sling.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What specific anti-competitive practices is Newsmax accusing Fox News of?

Newsmax alleges that Fox News uses explicit or implicit provisions to prevent cable providers from carrying Newsmax if they carry Fox News, or forces them to carry Fox's sister networks to increase costs for carrying Newsmax. They also claim Fox uses contractual barriers to hinder Newsmax's competition.

smh.com.au

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 20, 04:17

Lehrmann Appeals Defamation Ruling After Court Finds Rape

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a Federal Court decision that dismissed his defamation case against Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson following a finding that he raped Brittany Higgins; the appeal argues procedural unfairness due to discrepancies between court findings and broadcast allegations.

Lehrmann Appeals Defamation Ruling After Court Finds Rape

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a Federal Court decision that dismissed his defamation case against Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson following a finding that he raped Brittany Higgins; the appeal argues procedural unfairness due to discrepancies between court findings and broadcast allegations.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the Federal Court's finding of 'recklessness' regarding consent differ from the allegations presented, and what impact did this discrepancy have on Lehrmann's defense?

Lehrmann's appeal hinges on the assertion that he wasn't given a fair opportunity to respond to the specific version of events presented by the court. He claims the court's finding of a 'non-violent rape' differs from the 'violent rape' described in the broadcast, leading to procedural unfairness. This highlights the complexities of legal processes in high-profile cases and the potential for discrepancies in different standards of proof.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 19, 13:14

Trump Sues Wall Street Journal Over Epstein Letter

Donald Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch on Friday, stemming from a report about a sexually suggestive birthday letter Trump allegedly sent to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003; the WSJ stands by its report.

Trump Sues Wall Street Journal Over Epstein Letter

Donald Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch on Friday, stemming from a report about a sexually suggestive birthday letter Trump allegedly sent to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003; the WSJ stands by its report.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does this lawsuit connect to broader concerns about Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and the ongoing investigations surrounding Epstein's activities?

Trump's lawsuit highlights the ongoing scrutiny of his relationship with Epstein, especially given Epstein's past and the recent focus on a purported 'client list'. The DOJ and FBI have denied the existence of such a list and reaffirmed Epstein's suicide. Trump's allies, including the current FBI director, have called for the release of Epstein-related documents.

smh.com.au

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Jul 18, 04:12

Court Dismisses Contempt Case Against Sydney Morning Herald and The Age

The Federal Court dismissed a contempt of court application against The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age for allegedly breaching a suppression order related to Antoinette Lattouf's case, ruling the media outlets had a reasonably arguable defense and ordering the applicants to pay legal costs.

Court Dismisses Contempt Case Against Sydney Morning Herald and The Age

The Federal Court dismissed a contempt of court application against The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age for allegedly breaching a suppression order related to Antoinette Lattouf's case, ruling the media outlets had a reasonably arguable defense and ordering the applicants to pay legal costs.

Progress

28% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What arguments did the media outlets use to defend against the contempt of court allegations, and how did the judge weigh these arguments?

The case highlights the complexities of suppression orders and media responsibility. The court considered whether the media outlets knew the identities of those protected by the order and whether they had been notified. The judge's decision emphasizes the importance of clear communication and a robust defense against contempt allegations.

smh.com.au

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Jul 7, 10:12

Singleton Family Drops Copyright Lawsuit Against Nine Network

The family of Dawn Singleton, a victim of the April 2024 Bondi Junction stabbing, dropped their copyright lawsuit against Nine Network and The Sydney Morning Herald on Monday, preventing a trial that could have set a legal precedent for media use of social media content in news reporting.

Singleton Family Drops Copyright Lawsuit Against Nine Network

The family of Dawn Singleton, a victim of the April 2024 Bondi Junction stabbing, dropped their copyright lawsuit against Nine Network and The Sydney Morning Herald on Monday, preventing a trial that could have set a legal precedent for media use of social media content in news reporting.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does this case illustrate the conflict between media reporting practices and copyright laws in Australia?

This case highlights the ongoing tension between media rights to report news using publicly available material and individual copyright. The agreement avoids a court ruling on the scope of the 'fair dealing' exception in Australian copyright law, which would have significantly impacted Australian media practices. The defendants admitted to a common practice of sourcing images from social media for news reporting but argued it was lawful.

theguardian.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

May 23, 07:12

Court Upholds Journalist's Credibility in Roberts-Smith Defamation Case

An Australian Federal Court dismissed Ben Roberts-Smith's appeal against Nine Newspapers, highlighting the complexities of journalist-source relationships and emphasizing the need for caution in interpreting secretly recorded conversations; the ruling has implications for journalistic ethics and leg...

Court Upholds Journalist's Credibility in Roberts-Smith Defamation Case

An Australian Federal Court dismissed Ben Roberts-Smith's appeal against Nine Newspapers, highlighting the complexities of journalist-source relationships and emphasizing the need for caution in interpreting secretly recorded conversations; the ruling has implications for journalistic ethics and leg...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What long-term effects might this ruling have on the relationship between investigative journalism and the legal system in Australia?

This ruling could influence future investigations and legal cases involving journalists. The court's recognition of the strategic communication employed by journalists while speaking with sources may lead to more nuanced interpretations of similar situations in the future. The case also raises broader questions about the limits of investigative journalism and the protection of sources.

theguardian.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Aug 22, 19:19

Guardian Wins Defamation Case: Noel Clarke's Misconduct Reporting Vindicated

A British high court ruled that the Guardian's reporting on Noel Clarke's sexual misconduct was true and in the public interest, vindicating the accounts of over 20 women who accused the actor of various forms of harassment and bullying between 2004 and 2019.

Guardian Wins Defamation Case: Noel Clarke's Misconduct Reporting Vindicated

A British high court ruled that the Guardian's reporting on Noel Clarke's sexual misconduct was true and in the public interest, vindicating the accounts of over 20 women who accused the actor of various forms of harassment and bullying between 2004 and 2019.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the Guardian's investigative process and the judge's ruling address the challenges of reporting on sexual misconduct allegations?

The Guardian's comprehensive investigation, involving over 100 sources and testimony from 26 witnesses, demonstrates the challenges and importance of reporting on sexual misconduct. The judge praised the reporters' rigorous fact-checking and corroboration efforts, highlighting the extensive work undertaken to substantiate the allegations. The case underscores the systemic issues faced by women reporting sexual harassment, especially when the alleged perpetrator holds significant power within their industry.

azatutyun.am

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Aug 7, 22:16

Armenia's Revised Audiovisual Media Law Sparks Free Speech Concerns

Armenia's 2020 Audiovisual Media Law faces revisions due to legal ambiguities, prompting concerns from media experts that the amendments, expanding restrictions on content deemed harmful or inciting violence, will curb free speech ahead of elections; the proposed changes also add stricter rules for ...

Armenia's Revised Audiovisual Media Law Sparks Free Speech Concerns

Armenia's 2020 Audiovisual Media Law faces revisions due to legal ambiguities, prompting concerns from media experts that the amendments, expanding restrictions on content deemed harmful or inciting violence, will curb free speech ahead of elections; the proposed changes also add stricter rules for ...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What specific legal ambiguities in the 2020 law necessitate these amendments, and how do these ambiguities relate to the concerns of media experts?

Media experts fear the amendments, expanding restrictions beyond calls for illegal acts to include those promoting violence or regime change, could silence dissenting voices. This is fueled by concerns that political motivations, not genuine improvements, drive the changes, particularly with upcoming elections.

cnnespanol.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 19, 04:13

Trump Sues Wall Street Journal for \$20 Billion Over Epstein Letter

President Trump filed a \$20 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and its reporters, Khadeeja Safdar and Joe Palazzolo, over an article about a letter allegedly written by Trump to Jeffrey Epstein; Trump denies writing the letter and accuses the Journal of journalistic miscondu...

Trump Sues Wall Street Journal for \$20 Billion Over Epstein Letter

President Trump filed a \$20 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and its reporters, Khadeeja Safdar and Joe Palazzolo, over an article about a letter allegedly written by Trump to Jeffrey Epstein; Trump denies writing the letter and accuses the Journal of journalistic miscondu...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does this lawsuit connect to President Trump's past legal actions against media outlets, and what strategies does it reveal about his approach to handling criticism?

This lawsuit is part of a broader pattern of legal action by President Trump against news organizations he perceives as critical. His past lawsuits against ABC and CBS, settled with payments to his presidential library fund, and ongoing cases against Meta and X demonstrate a strategy of using litigation to silence or influence media coverage. The Journal case marks a significant escalation, targeting a major publication with a large defamation claim.

theguardian.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Jul 18, 04:12

Contempt Application Against Nine Entertainment Dismissed

A federal court dismissed a contempt application filed by a pro-Israel group against Nine Entertainment, its editors (Patrick Elligett and Bevan Shields), and reporters (Michael Bachelard and Calum Jaspan), for publishing names protected by a suppression order in the Antoinette Lattouf unlawful term...

Contempt Application Against Nine Entertainment Dismissed

A federal court dismissed a contempt application filed by a pro-Israel group against Nine Entertainment, its editors (Patrick Elligett and Bevan Shields), and reporters (Michael Bachelard and Calum Jaspan), for publishing names protected by a suppression order in the Antoinette Lattouf unlawful term...

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What factors contributed to the judge's decision to dismiss the contempt application, considering that a "reasonably arguable case of contempt" existed against some of Nine's employees?

The court's decision highlights the complexities of balancing freedom of the press with the protection of individuals from potential harm. Justice Rangiah's suppression order aimed to safeguard those who had complained about Lattouf's employment, but the publication of their names led to the contempt application. The judge's consideration of the resources required to prosecute a case of uncertain strength influenced the dismissal.

es.euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jun 5, 01:10

Hungary Delays Controversial Media Law Debate Until Autumn

Hungary's parliament will delay debate on a controversial media law until autumn, following criticism from the EU and concerns about its impact on media freedom and potential violations of EU law. The law would grant broad powers to monitor foreign-funded media and NGOs.

Hungary Delays Controversial Media Law Debate Until Autumn

Hungary's parliament will delay debate on a controversial media law until autumn, following criticism from the EU and concerns about its impact on media freedom and potential violations of EU law. The law would grant broad powers to monitor foreign-funded media and NGOs.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of delaying the Hungarian media law's parliamentary debate?

Hungary's controversial media law, deemed "impossible" by opposition parties and NGOs, will not be debated in Parliament until autumn. The ruling parties intend to use legal tools to protect "sovereignty," though disagreements remain on the specific instruments. Numerous amendments have been proposed, even from within the ruling coalition.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 21, 13:12

Sky News Defends Defamation Claim, Claims Lawyer is 'Jew Hater'

Sky News Australia and Andrew Bolt are defending a defamation lawsuit filed by lawyer Adam Houda, who claims their broadcasts and articles falsely labeled him a "Jew hater"; the defendants argue the statement is true, citing his extensive social media activity.

Sky News Defends Defamation Claim, Claims Lawyer is 'Jew Hater'

Sky News Australia and Andrew Bolt are defending a defamation lawsuit filed by lawyer Adam Houda, who claims their broadcasts and articles falsely labeled him a "Jew hater"; the defendants argue the statement is true, citing his extensive social media activity.

Progress

72% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did a social media post criticizing a government grant escalate into a defamation lawsuit involving claims of antisemitism?

The legal dispute stems from Bolt's commentary on Houda's X post criticizing a government grant. Bolt and Sky News allege Houda's social media history, including over 2000 posts, reveals antisemitic tropes, supporting their claim that the "Jew hater" imputation is accurate. Sky News issued a prior apology and removed the video content.

Showing 1 to 12 of 21 results