Tag #Research Funding

Showing 1 to 12 of 109 results

kathimerini.gr

🌐 45% Global Worthiness

Sep 6, 10:17

Epirus Region Launches "Research in Epirus" Funding Program

The Epirus Region announced a €15,000,000 funding program, "Research in Epirus," to promote collaborations between businesses and research organizations in Epirus, Greece, supporting innovation and R&D projects within specific sectors.

Epirus Region Launches "Research in Epirus" Funding Program

The Epirus Region announced a €15,000,000 funding program, "Research in Epirus," to promote collaborations between businesses and research organizations in Epirus, Greece, supporting innovation and R&D projects within specific sectors.

Progress

24% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the primary objective and impact of the "Research in Epirus" program?

The program aims to boost innovation and R&D in Epirus by funding collaborative projects between businesses and research organizations. This funding is expected to stimulate economic growth and create new opportunities within the region's prioritized sectors.

elpais.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 22, 07:19

Supreme Court Allows NIH Budget Cuts, Questions Legality

The US Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to temporarily cut $783 million from the NIH budget, impacting minority research programs, while also suggesting the cuts' illegality. The decision was 5-4, with Chief Justice Roberts siding with the liberal justices on one aspect.

Supreme Court Allows NIH Budget Cuts, Questions Legality

The US Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to temporarily cut $783 million from the NIH budget, impacting minority research programs, while also suggesting the cuts' illegality. The decision was 5-4, with Chief Justice Roberts siding with the liberal justices on one aspect.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the Supreme Court's decision regarding the NIH budget cuts?

The US Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to proceed with $783 million in cuts to the NIH, impacting minority-focused research programs. However, the court also deemed the administration's instructions for these cuts likely illegal. A lower court had issued a preliminary injunction, but the Supreme Court lifted it, arguing the case should have been filed in a different court.

de.euronews.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Aug 19, 16:13

EU Defends Research Funding on Islam Amidst Right-Wing Criticism

The European Commission defended its funding of €10 million+ in research projects on Islam and related topics, facing criticism from right-wing MEPs who alleged bias and questioned their value. The EU emphasized the projects' scientific merit and the rigorous peer-review process used in their select...

EU Defends Research Funding on Islam Amidst Right-Wing Criticism

The European Commission defended its funding of €10 million+ in research projects on Islam and related topics, facing criticism from right-wing MEPs who alleged bias and questioned their value. The EU emphasized the projects' scientific merit and the rigorous peer-review process used in their select...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the EU's response to the criticism address concerns about transparency and fairness in its research funding process?

The controversy highlights the tension between academic freedom and political sensitivities, with right-wing MEPs from Italy and France accusing the EU of unfairly promoting Islam or exaggerating Islamophobia. The EU's response emphasizes its rigorous peer-review process and commitment to transparency, citing over 17,000 funded projects and numerous prestigious awards resulting from ERC-funded research.

elpais.com

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Aug 16, 01:18

Spanish Universities in 2023 ARWU Ranking: A Performance Analysis

The 2023 ARWU ranking shows 36 Spanish universities (35 public, 1 private) among the top 1000 globally, reflecting Spain's lower-than-average spending on higher education and R&D compared to OECD and EU averages.

Spanish Universities in 2023 ARWU Ranking: A Performance Analysis

The 2023 ARWU ranking shows 36 Spanish universities (35 public, 1 private) among the top 1000 globally, reflecting Spain's lower-than-average spending on higher education and R&D compared to OECD and EU averages.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the overall performance of Spanish universities in the 2023 ARWU ranking, and what factors explain this performance?

The 2023 Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) shows that 36 Spanish universities (35 public, 1 private) are ranked among the top 1000 globally. This represents over 70% of Spain's public universities. However, none are in the top 100.

forbes.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Aug 10, 16:16

Executive Order Politicizes Federal Health Grants, Jeopardizing NIH Research

A new executive order requires all federal health grants to be approved by senior political appointees, aligning them with the president's agenda; this unprecedented action affects all HHS agencies, including the NIH, impacting grant awards and potentially jeopardizing ongoing research by introducin...

Executive Order Politicizes Federal Health Grants, Jeopardizing NIH Research

A new executive order requires all federal health grants to be approved by senior political appointees, aligning them with the president's agenda; this unprecedented action affects all HHS agencies, including the NIH, impacting grant awards and potentially jeopardizing ongoing research by introducin...

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term economic consequences of this executive order on scientific research and development in the United States?

The executive order politicizes grantmaking, potentially jeopardizing the NIH's role in biomedical research and its economic impact. The order allows for grant termination based on shifting political priorities, creating uncertainty and undermining the merit-based system. This interference disrupts established collaborations between the government and research institutions, potentially hindering scientific advancements and economic growth (NIH generates $2.56 for every $1 invested).

dw.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Aug 8, 22:17

US Cuts $500 Million in mRNA Vaccine Research Funding

The US Department of Health and Human Services, led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., slashed $500 million in mRNA vaccine research funding, citing ineffective protection against respiratory infections, despite expert consensus on the technology's life-saving role during the COVID-19 pandemic and its potent...

US Cuts $500 Million in mRNA Vaccine Research Funding

The US Department of Health and Human Services, led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., slashed $500 million in mRNA vaccine research funding, citing ineffective protection against respiratory infections, despite expert consensus on the technology's life-saving role during the COVID-19 pandemic and its potent...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the US government's $500 million cut in funding for mRNA vaccine research?

The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), under Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., cut $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine research at the NIH, citing ineffective protection against upper respiratory infections. This decision halted 22 projects and prompted immediate criticism from experts who highlight mRNA vaccines' crucial role in saving millions of lives during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pfizer shares dropped 3% following the announcement.

lexpress.fr

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Aug 26, 22:20

Trump's $2.42 Billion Harvard Funding Cuts Spark Lawsuit

The Trump administration cut nearly $2.42 billion in research grants to Harvard University, citing an allegedly progressive ideology and anti-Israel bias; Harvard sued, arguing the cuts violate its First Amendment rights, impacting research on various critical issues and potentially leading to staff...

Trump's $2.42 Billion Harvard Funding Cuts Spark Lawsuit

The Trump administration cut nearly $2.42 billion in research grants to Harvard University, citing an allegedly progressive ideology and anti-Israel bias; Harvard sued, arguing the cuts violate its First Amendment rights, impacting research on various critical issues and potentially leading to staff...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did Harvard University respond to the funding cuts, and what broader implications does this have for academic freedom and research funding?

Harvard's legal challenge against the Trump administration's grant cuts highlights a broader concern about political interference in scientific research funding. The cuts disproportionately affect research on topics such as gender identity and systemic inequalities, areas frequently targeted by conservative lawmakers. This raises questions about the future of federally funded research and the potential chilling effect on academic freedom.

theglobeandmail.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 22, 04:16

Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration to Cut $783 Million in NIH Funding

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to allow the Trump administration to cut $783 million in NIH research funding aligned with its anti-DEI priorities, though blocking future cuts under the same directive; the decision follows a lower court ruling deeming the cuts arbitrary and discriminatory.

Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration to Cut $783 Million in NIH Funding

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to allow the Trump administration to cut $783 million in NIH research funding aligned with its anti-DEI priorities, though blocking future cuts under the same directive; the decision follows a lower court ruling deeming the cuts arbitrary and discriminatory.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of the Supreme Court's decision on NIH research funding and what are the short-term consequences?

The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to cut $783 million in NIH research funding, citing alignment with the administration's priorities. This decision, a 5-4 split, overturns a lower court's injunction and enables the administration to proceed with grant cancellations. However, a key vote by Justice Barrett maintained a block on the administration's anti-DEI directive for future funding.

cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 16, 04:16

NIH Announces Unified Strategy, Shifting Funding Priorities

The director of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, announced a unified strategy on Friday to prioritize agency funding toward chronic diseases, nutrition, AI, alternative testing models, and research that can be replicated, while emphasizing transparency and a shift to...

NIH Announces Unified Strategy, Shifting Funding Priorities

The director of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, announced a unified strategy on Friday to prioritize agency funding toward chronic diseases, nutrition, AI, alternative testing models, and research that can be replicated, while emphasizing transparency and a shift to...

Progress

64% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the key priorities outlined in the NIH's new unified strategy, and how do these priorities reflect the agency's response to recent changes and budget constraints?

The NIH director announced a new strategy to align the agency's priorities and funding, emphasizing transparency and focusing on chronic diseases, nutrition, AI, and alternative testing models. This follows recent budget cuts, grant cancellations, and reorganization, aiming to clarify the agency's direction and ensure taxpayer funds are used effectively. Key priorities include research on autism, HIV/AIDS, and racial disparities, but with a shift towards solution-oriented approaches, de-emphasizing race-based research lacking scientific justification.

forbes.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 13, 16:19

Judge Orders Reinstatement of UCLA Grants Amidst Federal Dispute

On August 15, Judge Rita Lin ordered the Trump administration to restore roughly 300 NSF grants to UCLA, totaling a significant portion of the $584 million in federal funding the administration had previously frozen, following allegations of civil rights violations and a demand for a $1 billion paym...

Judge Orders Reinstatement of UCLA Grants Amidst Federal Dispute

On August 15, Judge Rita Lin ordered the Trump administration to restore roughly 300 NSF grants to UCLA, totaling a significant portion of the $584 million in federal funding the administration had previously frozen, following allegations of civil rights violations and a demand for a $1 billion paym...

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of Judge Lin's ruling on UCLA's research funding?

Judge Rita Lin ordered the Trump administration to reinstate approximately 300 NSF grants to UCLA, totaling a significant portion of the $584 million initially frozen. This follows the administration's demand for a $1 billion payment from UCLA to resolve civil rights allegations, a demand rejected by the university. The ruling temporarily halts the administration's actions but doesn't resolve the underlying dispute.

edition.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 9, 10:13

Trump Administration Escalates Harvard Dispute, Threatening Patent Seizure

The Trump administration is investigating Harvard University for potential breaches of federal research funding and intellectual property regulations, initiating a 'march-in' process under the Bayh-Dole Act that could lead to the government seizing patents or imposing third-party licenses; this foll...

Trump Administration Escalates Harvard Dispute, Threatening Patent Seizure

The Trump administration is investigating Harvard University for potential breaches of federal research funding and intellectual property regulations, initiating a 'march-in' process under the Bayh-Dole Act that could lead to the government seizing patents or imposing third-party licenses; this foll...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the Trump administration's accusations against Harvard University regarding its handling of federally funded research and intellectual property?

The Trump administration is accusing Harvard University of violating federal research funding and intellectual property regulations, potentially leading to the loss of funding or patents. A comprehensive review of Harvard's federally funded research programs is underway, and the administration is initiating the 'march-in' process under the Bayh-Dole Act, which could result in the government taking ownership of Harvard's patents.

elpais.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 6, 10:19

Nobel Laureates Sound Alarm on Trump's Impact on US Science

Nobel laureates in Physics, Chemistry, and Medicine express alarm over Trump's policies, citing funding cuts, anti-immigrant stances, and threats to democratic norms, predicting a long-term decline in US scientific leadership and a 3.8% GDP reduction.

Nobel Laureates Sound Alarm on Trump's Impact on US Science

Nobel laureates in Physics, Chemistry, and Medicine express alarm over Trump's policies, citing funding cuts, anti-immigrant stances, and threats to democratic norms, predicting a long-term decline in US scientific leadership and a 3.8% GDP reduction.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate and long-term consequences of Trump's policies on scientific research and the US's global standing in science and technology?

Nobel laureates in the US express deep concern over Trump's policies impacting science, research, and healthcare, citing potential negative consequences for future generations and the nation's global leadership in these fields. Several laureates, including Roald Hoffmann, Joachim Frank, and Rich Roberts, shared their anxieties about reduced funding, attacks on democracy, and anti-immigrant sentiments.

Showing 1 to 12 of 109 results