Tag #Research Integrity

Showing 1 to 12 of 12 results

lemonde.fr

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 25, 13:20

Crisis in Scientific Publishing: Quality Declines Amidst Funding Issues and Political Interference

Le Monde" reports a crisis in scientific publishing due to increased article numbers, driven by quantitative research evaluations and for-profit publishers, leading to lower quality and increased retractions; the US government's interference further jeopardizes scientific integrity.

Crisis in Scientific Publishing: Quality Declines Amidst Funding Issues and Political Interference

Le Monde" reports a crisis in scientific publishing due to increased article numbers, driven by quantitative research evaluations and for-profit publishers, leading to lower quality and increased retractions; the US government's interference further jeopardizes scientific integrity.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How do the conflicting interests of public research funding and for-profit publishing contribute to the current crisis in scientific publications?

The crisis reflects a conflict between public funding and private profit in scientific publishing. The unchecked growth of for-profit publishers, with their high profit margins, contrasts with the rising costs for public research institutions and the decline in scientific rigor. This raises concerns about the efficient use of public funds and the integrity of scientific research.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 12, 16:19

Scientific Fraud Networks Jeopardize Research

A new study reveals that networks of editors and brokers are publishing fraudulent research at scale, bypassing peer review and impacting medical research and technological progress. The research, published in PNAS, analyzed over 5 million articles across 70,000 journals.

Scientific Fraud Networks Jeopardize Research

A new study reveals that networks of editors and brokers are publishing fraudulent research at scale, bypassing peer review and impacting medical research and technological progress. The research, published in PNAS, analyzed over 5 million articles across 70,000 journals.

Progress

28% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of large-scale scientific fraud on the advancement of medical treatments and technological progress?

A new study reveals networks of scientific journal editors and brokers are publishing fraudulent research at scale, bypassing peer review. This undermines trust in science, biasing analyses and delaying crucial research advancements, impacting areas like medical treatments and technological progress.

smh.com.au

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 27, 13:13

Calls for Independent Scientific Watchdog in Australia After Research Misconduct Case

Concerns over Australia's research integrity system have prompted calls for an independent watchdog after multiple investigations failed to initially uncover research misconduct by a prominent cancer researcher, despite evidence dating back over 10 years.

Calls for Independent Scientific Watchdog in Australia After Research Misconduct Case

Concerns over Australia's research integrity system have prompted calls for an independent watchdog after multiple investigations failed to initially uncover research misconduct by a prominent cancer researcher, despite evidence dating back over 10 years.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the identified flaws in Australia's research integrity system?

Australia's current research integrity system, designed in 2007, is deemed inadequate due to inherent conflicts of interest. Multiple investigations failed to uncover research misconduct by Professor Mark Smyth until a final inquiry found serious misconduct. This has led to calls for an independent scientific watchdog.

kathimerini.gr

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jun 5, 01:11

AI-Generated Articles Infiltrate Academic Journal: 48 of 53 Low-Citation Papers Appear AI-Generated

Diomidis Spinellis's research revealed that 48 out of 53 low-citation articles in a specific journal appear AI-generated, many falsely attributed to researchers from universities like Washington University and UC Berkeley; two listed authors were deceased at publication time, highlighting the threat...

AI-Generated Articles Infiltrate Academic Journal: 48 of 53 Low-Citation Papers Appear AI-Generated

Diomidis Spinellis's research revealed that 48 out of 53 low-citation articles in a specific journal appear AI-generated, many falsely attributed to researchers from universities like Washington University and UC Berkeley; two listed authors were deceased at publication time, highlighting the threat...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the research identify articles likely written by AI, and what specific indicators were used?

Spinellis's research found that many articles were falsely attributed to researchers from prestigious universities, including Washington University and the University of California at Berkeley. In two instances, the falsely listed authors were deceased at the time of publication. This highlights a concerning trend of AI-generated misinformation infiltrating academic journals.

sueddeutsche.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 2, 10:10

Major Statistical Error Invalidates Widely Cited Study on Race and Violence

A 2017 study on race and violence, widely cited in subsequent research, contained a major statistical error identified by the "Error: A Bug Bounty Program for Science" project, invalidating its key conclusions and highlighting the need for improved error detection in scientific publications.

Major Statistical Error Invalidates Widely Cited Study on Race and Violence

A 2017 study on race and violence, widely cited in subsequent research, contained a major statistical error identified by the "Error: A Bug Bounty Program for Science" project, invalidating its key conclusions and highlighting the need for improved error detection in scientific publications.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the key implications of the statistical error found in the 2017 study on race and violence, and how does this impact future research relying on its findings?

A 2017 study on the relationship between race and violence contained a major statistical error, invalidating its conclusions. Researchers from the "Error: A Bug Bounty Program for Science" project identified a flawed statistical model unable to account for the regional proportion of Black residents. The study's lead author acknowledged the error.

lemonde.fr

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Dec 17, 22:11

Hoax Scientific Articles Expose Predatory Journals

Canadian biologist Zen Faulkes analyzed 27 hoax scientific articles published between 2009 and 2020, highlighting the problem of predatory journals that prioritize profit over quality control, exemplified by a 2014 hoax published in the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology consistin...

Hoax Scientific Articles Expose Predatory Journals

Canadian biologist Zen Faulkes analyzed 27 hoax scientific articles published between 2009 and 2020, highlighting the problem of predatory journals that prioritize profit over quality control, exemplified by a 2014 hoax published in the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology consistin...

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What long-term effects could the acceptance of fraudulent research have on public trust in science and the scientific community?

The prevalence of accepted hoaxes underscores the need for stricter quality control in scientific publishing, particularly within the open-access model. Faulkes's research serves as a cautionary tale and a resource for identifying and avoiding predatory journals.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 16, 16:17

Networks of Editors Publish Fraudulent Scientific Research

A PNAS study reveals networks of journal editors colluding to publish low-quality research, jeopardizing medical and scientific advancements due to organized deception and pressure on researchers to publish.

Networks of Editors Publish Fraudulent Scientific Research

A PNAS study reveals networks of journal editors colluding to publish low-quality research, jeopardizing medical and scientific advancements due to organized deception and pressure on researchers to publish.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the extent of fraudulent scientific research networks and their impact on medical and scientific advancements?

A new study published in PNAS analyzed over 5 million scientific papers across 70,000 journals, revealing networks of editors colluding to publish low-quality research. This widespread fraudulent activity jeopardizes the reliability of scientific findings and medical research.

lexpress.fr

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 7, 19:18

Cognitive Bias Distorts Acceptance of Scientific Findings

A University of Pennsylvania study reveals how cognitive biases influence the acceptance of scientific findings, showing people use flawed arguments to reject results challenging their beliefs, even leading to self-censorship among scientists, thus hindering scientific progress and public understand...

Cognitive Bias Distorts Acceptance of Scientific Findings

A University of Pennsylvania study reveals how cognitive biases influence the acceptance of scientific findings, showing people use flawed arguments to reject results challenging their beliefs, even leading to self-censorship among scientists, thus hindering scientific progress and public understand...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does cognitive bias impact the acceptance and rejection of scientific findings, and what are the immediate implications for public understanding of scientific research?

A recent study from the University of Pennsylvania reveals that people tend to use flawed arguments to reject scientific findings that challenge their beliefs. Participants were more likely to accept weak criticisms of studies whose results contradicted their preconceptions, demonstrating a bias against inconvenient truths. This cognitive dissonance, as described by Festinger, highlights how beliefs often supersede objective evaluation.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 14, 07:11

Hidden Prompts in Pre-prints Bias AI Peer Reviews

Researchers are embedding hidden prompts within pre-print papers to bias AI peer review tools toward positive evaluations, as reported by Nikkei and Nature, revealing 36 papers with such prompts across 14 academic institutions in eight countries, raising concerns about the integrity of AI-powered re...

Hidden Prompts in Pre-prints Bias AI Peer Reviews

Researchers are embedding hidden prompts within pre-print papers to bias AI peer review tools toward positive evaluations, as reported by Nikkei and Nature, revealing 36 papers with such prompts across 14 academic institutions in eight countries, raising concerns about the integrity of AI-powered re...

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of academics using hidden prompts in pre-print papers to influence AI-powered peer reviews?

Academics are embedding hidden prompts in pre-print papers to manipulate AI review tools into giving positive assessments. Nikkei and Nature uncovered numerous instances across various institutions and countries, with prompts ranging from general positivity requests to specific instructions on review content. This practice is intended to counter the use of AI for peer review, potentially undermining the integrity of the review process.

dailymail.co.uk

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 27, 01:11

Harvard Fires Tenured Professor for Data Fabrication

Harvard University fired tenured professor Francesca Gino for fabricating data in at least four research studies after an internal investigation prompted by data bloggers who found inconsistencies across her work, leading to the retraction of multiple publications.

Harvard Fires Tenured Professor for Data Fabrication

Harvard University fired tenured professor Francesca Gino for fabricating data in at least four research studies after an internal investigation prompted by data bloggers who found inconsistencies across her work, leading to the retraction of multiple publications.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of Harvard's decision to dismiss Professor Gino for data fabrication, and what does it signify for academic research integrity?

Harvard University dismissed Francesca Gino, a tenured professor, following an investigation that revealed data fabrication in at least four of her research studies. This decision, unprecedented in recent decades at Harvard, resulted in the retraction of multiple published articles and a significant reputational blow for Gino, who had previously received widespread acclaim for her behavioral research on dishonesty.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Feb 6, 04:09

AJPH Defies Government Censorship of Public Health Research

The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) declared it will not censor research, even if it means fewer submissions from federally employed scientists who fear repercussions from publishing research containing 'forbidden terms'.

AJPH Defies Government Censorship of Public Health Research

The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) declared it will not censor research, even if it means fewer submissions from federally employed scientists who fear repercussions from publishing research containing 'forbidden terms'.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of the AJPH's decision to reject government censorship on the publication of public health research?

The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) will continue publishing studies regardless of government censorship, prioritizing its ethical guidelines over potential restrictions. This decision may lead to fewer submissions from federal employees and researchers due to self-censorship fears. The journal's leadership emphasizes that peer review will remain the standard for evaluating submissions, irrespective of prior censorship.

elpais.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Dec 5, 10:08

Saudi University Ranking Scheme Exposed: 76% Drop in Highly Cited Scientists

An investigation revealed a scheme where Saudi universities paid foreign scientists to falsely claim affiliation, inflating their rankings; this led to a 76% drop in highly cited scientists linked to Saudi institutions since April 2023, exposing vulnerabilities in academic ranking systems and impact...

Saudi University Ranking Scheme Exposed: 76% Drop in Highly Cited Scientists

An investigation revealed a scheme where Saudi universities paid foreign scientists to falsely claim affiliation, inflating their rankings; this led to a 76% drop in highly cited scientists linked to Saudi institutions since April 2023, exposing vulnerabilities in academic ranking systems and impact...

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the impact of the exposed scheme to manipulate academic rankings on the reputation of Saudi Arabian universities?

The number of highly cited scientists claiming affiliation with Saudi Arabian universities plummeted 76% since April 2023, dropping from 109 to 26. This follows an EL PAÍS investigation revealing a scheme where researchers were paid to falsely claim employment to boost Saudi institutions' rankings. The scandal resulted in the expulsion of at least one researcher and significant ranking drops for involved universities.

Showing 1 to 12 of 12 results