dw.com
10,000-Year-Old Smoke-Based Mummification Found in Southeast Asia
A study published in PNAS reveals evidence of smoke-based mummification practices dating back at least 10,000 years in Southeast Asia, predating previously known techniques in Chile and Egypt, showcasing a unique cultural tradition.
- How does this discovery change our understanding of early mummification techniques and their global distribution?
- The discovery pushes back the known origins of artificial mummification by thousands of years. Instead of originating in the Americas or Egypt, evidence shows smoke-based mummification was practiced in Southeast Asia starting at least 10,000 years ago, demonstrating a previously unknown early form of this practice that was geographically widespread.
- What specific methods were used in this ancient mummification process, and what insights do they offer into the beliefs and practices of these societies?
- The study shows that bodies were subjected to a lengthy process of low-intensity smoke-drying over fires before burial, similar to methods observed in some contemporary Indigenous communities. This required three months of continuous care, highlighting a deep cultural commitment to preserving the deceased and supporting the presence of strong spiritual beliefs.
- What are the long-term implications of this discovery for our understanding of cultural practices and beliefs in pre-Neolithic societies, and what further research could expand our knowledge?
- This finding underscores the diversity and sophistication of mortuary practices in early human societies and suggests a deeper understanding of cultural continuity across millennia is necessary. Further research could analyze genetic material to study population movements and potentially clarify the cultural transmission routes of this technique across Southeast Asia.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents the discovery of ancient mummification techniques in Southeast Asia as a significant advancement, highlighting its age and longevity. The framing emphasizes the unique aspects of this smoke-based mummification, comparing it favorably to other methods and suggesting it's not "less advanced." The focus on the longevity of the practice and the dedication involved reinforces the cultural importance and the deep human impulse behind it. However, it could benefit from a broader discussion of the cultural context and implications of these practices beyond the technical aspects.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective, with a focus on scientific findings. Terms like "artificial mummification" are used descriptively. However, phrases like "deep love and spiritual devotion" to describe the motivations behind the practice are potentially subjective interpretations and may introduce a degree of bias. More neutral phrasing would improve objectivity.
Bias by Omission
While the article discusses the age and persistence of smoke-based mummification in Southeast Asia, it omits comparisons to similar practices in other regions beyond brief mentions of Chile and Egypt. A more thorough comparative analysis could provide a richer understanding of the global context of early mummification traditions and potential influences. Additionally, the social structures and beliefs surrounding these practices could receive further attention. This omission doesn't necessarily mislead, but it limits the scope of understanding.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the significant time and resources invested in ancient mummification practices. This indirectly relates to SDG 1 (No Poverty) by showcasing the level of societal organization and resource allocation possible even in pre-Neolithic societies, suggesting a level of societal stability and cooperation that could contribute to reducing poverty in different contexts. The dedication to preserving ancestors suggests a societal structure capable of supporting such elaborate rituals, implying a degree of economic and social stability.