kathimerini.gr
2024 Greek University Applications Open: Score Changes Expected
Greek university applications open electronically around July 7th, closing July 17th, for 88,637 students; results indicate score changes across fields due to candidate preferences and shared program increases.
- What are the key changes in the 2024 university application process in Greece compared to previous years?
- 73,941 General Lyceum and 14,696 Vocational Lyceum candidates who took the exams are in the final stages of completing their applications. Electronic submission opens around July 7th and closes July 17th. Those exceeding the minimum admission score for their field can apply to a university.
- What are the potential long-term impacts of the increasing number of shared university programs on university applications and admission scores in Greece?
- The 2024 admission scores will be influenced by candidate preferences. Increased demand for specific fields could lead to higher scores, while decreased interest may result in lower scores. The increase in shared programs (181 out of 456 programs, or 39.69%) makes predictions complex.
- How do the performance results in each scientific field (Humanities, Sciences, Health Sciences, Economics and Informatics) influence the expected changes in admission scores?
- Candidates exceeding the minimum admission score (ΕΒΕ) for a program in their scientific field can submit applications to a Higher Education Institution (ΑΕΙ). Those who did not meet the minimum score can apply to a public ΙΕΚ. This year's results show trends indicating changes in admission scores.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents the expert's analysis prominently, potentially giving undue weight to his predictions. The structure uses direct quotes from the expert to frame the discussion of each field, reinforcing his perspective as central to understanding the trends. Headlines and subheadings emphasize predictions of score increases or decreases, potentially influencing reader focus and interpretation of the overall data.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral. Terms like "explosive increase" and "very large fall" might be considered slightly loaded, but remain descriptive rather than overtly biased. The analysis uses precise numerical data which enhances objectivity.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses primarily on the opinions of a single expert, Mr. Stratos Strategakis, potentially overlooking other perspectives on the factors influencing university entrance scores. While acknowledging that applicant preferences affect scores, the piece could benefit from including data or opinions from other relevant sources, such as university admissions officers or educational policy experts. Omission of specific school names and their associated score changes limits detailed analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view by focusing primarily on the expected rise or fall of entrance scores across different fields, without fully exploring the complexity of individual school rankings and the interplay of numerous variables influencing final admission. While acknowledging the role of applicant preferences, the analysis does not delve into the specifics of how these preferences might interact with other factors to create unexpected outcomes.
Gender Bias
The article doesn't exhibit overt gender bias in its language or representation. The expert quoted is male, but this alone does not constitute bias as long as his expertise is relevant and his analysis is objectively presented. However, the analysis could include a broader spectrum of sources to mitigate any unconscious bias.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the results of Greek university entrance exams and the process of applying to universities. This directly relates to SDG 4 (Quality Education) as it highlights the process by which students access higher education. The analysis of student performance and the adjustments to university entrance requirements impact the quality and accessibility of education.