taz.de
40 Akraps Gather in Croatian Mountain Village, Banishing Trump from Conversation
Forty members of the Akrap family, some from the US and others from Croatia, reunited in the village of Voštane, Croatia, explicitly excluding any mention of Donald Trump from their celebration.
- What was the most striking aspect of this family reunion in Voštane?
- The reunion, held in a village where 300 Akraps were murdered in 1944, was marked by a deliberate exclusion of any discussion of Donald Trump. The family, despite its divided location and history, united in its rejection of him.
- How did the family's history and the setting influence the gathering's atmosphere?
- The reunion took place in Voštane, a village where a massacre of 300 Akraps occurred in 1944. This historical context, coupled with the family's diverse origins (some from the US, others from Croatia) created a complex atmosphere where shared trauma and present-day political concerns collided.
- What are the potential longer-term implications of this event and the family's decision to exclude Trump from their conversations?
- The family's unified rejection of Trump symbolizes a broader sentiment beyond their specific context. This event could reflect a growing international aversion to Trump's influence and actions, pointing to potential long-term shifts in political and social dynamics.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the gathering of the Akrap family as a joyous event contrasting sharply with the historical tragedy of the SS massacre. The juxtaposition of opulent meals and the horrific past, while factually accurate, subtly influences the reader to focus on the present celebration rather than dwelling on the past trauma. The explicit exclusion of Donald Trump from the narrative also contributes to this framing, positioning him as an unwelcome element disrupting the festive atmosphere.
Language Bias
The language used is largely descriptive and avoids overtly charged terms. However, phrases like "a great horror" and descriptions comparing attire to "gangsters and gangster brides in US films" subtly inject negative connotations related to Trump's presidency, although not directly linked to him. The description of Trump as someone who "made the USA into a severely ill patient" is clearly biased.
Bias by Omission
The article omits details about the political views of the Akrap family members, preventing a complete understanding of why Trump's exclusion was so strongly enforced. Additionally, the focus on the contrast between the lavish celebration and the past massacre could be seen as an omission of the complex socio-political factors that contributed to both events. The lack of specific details about the SS massacre limits a thorough understanding of that historical event.
False Dichotomy
The narrative presents a false dichotomy by contrasting the joyous family reunion with the negative image of Trump's presidency. This simplification ignores the nuances of American politics and the diversity of opinions within the family regarding Trump. The article suggests that excluding Trump from the celebration is the only appropriate response, not acknowledging other possible viewpoints.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a family gathering where the attendees consciously chose to exclude discussion of a controversial political figure, promoting an environment of peace and unity. This reflects a desire for strong institutions built on respectful dialogue and the avoidance of divisive political figures. While not directly addressing SDG targets, it represents a microcosm of positive social interaction conducive to peace.