kathimerini.gr
Abu Ghraib Torture Case: $42 Million Awarded
A US court awarded $42 million to three former Abu Ghraib detainees for torture, holding contractor CACI responsible.
Greek
Greece
JusticeHuman Rights ViolationsUs PoliticsMiddle EastHuman RightsMilitaryLawsuitTorture
CaciUs ArmyAssociated Press
Suhail Al-ShimariSalah Al-EjailiAsad Al-Zubae
- What was CACI's defense against the allegations?
- CACI argued that their employees had minimal interaction with the plaintiffs and that the military's records contradicted some of the claims. They also argued any responsibility for the mistreatment belonged to the government.
- What were the allegations made by the plaintiffs against CACI?
- The three plaintiffs, Suhail Al-Shimari, Salah Al-Ejaili, and Asad Al-Zubae, alleged beatings, sexual abuse, forced nudity, and other harsh treatment. The jury found CACI's interrogators complicit, not directly responsible for the abuse, because they conspired with military police to mistreat the detainees before interrogation.
- How did one of the plaintiffs, Al-Ejaili, react to the verdict?
- Al-Ejaili, a journalist, stated that this victory is for all victims of abuse and a warning to companies engaging in such acts. He and other plaintiffs presented evidence, though not personally pictured in the infamous photos of abuse, detailing similar mistreatment.
- What was the outcome of the US court case concerning Abu Ghraib?
- A US court awarded $42 million to three former detainees of Abu Ghraib prison for torture they endured. The court held contractor CACI responsible for its involvement in the torture and abuse, awarding each plaintiff $14 million in damages.
- What were some of the significant delays in the legal proceedings?
- The lawsuit, filed in 2008, faced delays due to legal battles and CACI's attempts to prevent trial. The case highlights the long-lasting consequences of human rights violations and the challenges in seeking justice for victims of torture.