kathimerini.gr
Africa-led campaign replaces Mercator projection for accurate map representation
A campaign promoting the Equal Earth map projection, which accurately represents Africa's size, is gaining momentum; the African Union endorsed it, aiming to replace the historically inaccurate Mercator projection used globally in education and media.
- What are the implications of the Mercator projection's inaccurate depiction of Africa's size on global perceptions and international relations?
- The Mercator projection, a popular world map, misrepresents the size of continents; Africa appears much smaller than its actual size compared to Greenland. The Equal Earth projection accurately reflects continental sizes, showing Africa as 14 times larger than Greenland. This has led to a campaign urging adoption of the Equal Earth projection for accurate representation.
- How does the campaign to adopt the Equal Earth projection aim to address the historical inaccuracies and biases perpetuated by the Mercator projection?
- The campaign to replace the Mercator projection with the Equal Earth projection highlights the historical distortion of African size on world maps. This distortion has implications for global perception of Africa's economic, demographic, and strategic importance. The African Union's endorsement marks a significant step towards correcting this long-standing issue.
- What are the potential long-term effects of adopting the Equal Earth projection on educational materials, international cooperation, and global awareness of Africa's true size and significance?
- The shift from the Mercator to the Equal Earth projection signifies a move towards more accurate global representation, impacting education and international relations. Adopting Equal Earth will offer a more balanced perspective, potentially challenging ingrained biases about Africa's global significance and fostering a more equitable understanding of world geography.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the issue as a campaign for correcting a historical inaccuracy and promoting a more accurate representation of Africa. The headline and introduction emphasize the distorted image of Africa and the positive impact of switching to the Equal Earth projection. This framing could influence the reader's perception of the Mercator projection as inherently biased and the Equal Earth as the definitive solution.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and objective. However, phrases like "parochial" to describe the Mercator projection and highlighting that using it "doesn't make sense today" carries a slightly negative connotation. The article also repeatedly mentions the large population of Africa to emphasize the significance of the size distortion. While this is factually accurate, this repetition might subtly influence readers' perceptions about the importance of the issue.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the distortion of Africa's size in the Mercator projection and the campaign to adopt the Equal Earth projection. However, it omits discussion of other map projections and their potential biases or advantages. It also doesn't delve into the historical context of why the Mercator projection became so widely used, beyond its navigational utility. While these omissions might be due to space constraints, they could limit a reader's complete understanding of the issue.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by contrasting the Mercator projection with the Equal Earth projection as if they are the only two options. Other map projections exist that offer different compromises between accuracy of area and shape. This simplification might lead readers to believe there's only one viable alternative to the Mercator projection.
Sustainable Development Goals
The campaign to replace the Mercator projection with the Equal Earth projection addresses the issue of geographical misrepresentation, which has perpetuated skewed perceptions of the size and importance of Africa. Using the Equal Earth projection promotes a more accurate understanding of global proportions and counters historical biases embedded in the Mercator projection, thereby contributing to reduced inequalities in global representation and perception.