fr.euronews.com
AI Adoption Creates Jobs and Higher Wages, PwC Study Finds
PwC's 2025 Global AI Jobs Barometer, based on nearly a billion job postings across 20 countries, shows that companies adopting AI create more jobs and offer higher wages; employees in AI-related sectors see a 56% wage advantage.
- What is the impact of AI on job creation and worker compensation, according to PwC's Global AI Jobs Barometer?
- PwC's 2025 Global AI Jobs Barometer reveals that businesses adopting AI create more jobs, not fewer, based on analyzing nearly a billion job postings across 20 countries. Companies leveraging AI for productivity boosts see a threefold increase in revenue per employee, leading to higher wages for employees in AI-related sectors, exceeding other sectors by double.
- What are the key challenges and opportunities in preparing the workforce for the evolving job market shaped by AI adoption?
- Future job markets will require managing AI agents alongside human teams, a skill currently underdeveloped. The educational requirements for AI-related jobs are decreasing faster than in other sectors, indicating a growing accessibility to AI-driven employment. This necessitates a proactive approach to upskilling and reskilling the workforce to effectively integrate AI into various roles.
- How are the roles of managers and employees expected to evolve with the increased integration of AI, particularly agent-based AI?
- The study highlights a positive correlation between AI adoption and job creation, with increased revenue per employee translating to higher wages. A 56% wage advantage was observed for individuals enhancing skills through AI, exceeding the 25% reported last year. This suggests that AI adoption fosters economic growth and improved employee compensation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is overwhelmingly positive, emphasizing the benefits of AI on job creation and salary increases. The headline and opening statements immediately highlight the positive findings, setting a tone that continues throughout the article. While it mentions concerns about job obsolescence, it quickly dismisses them with positive data. This framing could lead readers to underestimate the potential challenges of AI adoption.
Language Bias
The language used is generally positive and upbeat. Phrases like "creates more jobs, not less" and "exactly the opposite" are used to emphasize the positive findings. While not overtly biased, the consistently positive tone might subtly influence reader perception. More neutral language could improve objectivity.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the positive impacts of AI on the job market, potentially omitting or downplaying potential negative consequences such as job displacement in specific sectors or the widening gap between high-skilled and low-skilled workers. Further investigation into these aspects would provide a more balanced perspective.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view by focusing primarily on the job creation aspect of AI adoption, without adequately addressing the complexities and potential downsides. It implies a straightforward positive correlation between AI adoption and job growth, neglecting nuances and potential negative impacts.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights that AI adoption leads to job creation and increased salaries, boosting economic growth and improving working conditions. PwC's research indicates that companies using AI see a threefold increase in revenue per employee, and employees in AI-exposed sectors experience twice the salary growth. This directly contributes to decent work and economic growth by creating new opportunities and improving existing ones.