AI and Radiocarbon Dating Reveal Dead Sea Scrolls Older Than Thought

AI and Radiocarbon Dating Reveal Dead Sea Scrolls Older Than Thought

us.cnn.com

AI and Radiocarbon Dating Reveal Dead Sea Scrolls Older Than Thought

A new study using radiocarbon dating and artificial intelligence suggests some Dead Sea Scrolls are up to 100 years older than previously thought, dating back to the late fourth century BCE, altering our understanding of ancient Judaism and early Christianity.

English
United States
Arts And CultureScienceArtificial IntelligenceArchaeologyDead Sea ScrollsRadiocarbon DatingBiblical TextsAncient Manuscripts
University Of GroningenPlos OneUniversity Of ChicagoUniversity Of BirminghamNew York UniversityUniversity Of Kentucky
Mladen PopovićWillard LibbyCharlotte HempelLawrence H. SchiffmanBrent Seales
How does the new study's dating of the Dead Sea Scrolls, using AI-enhanced radiocarbon dating, change our understanding of ancient Judaism and early Christianity?
A new study using radiocarbon dating and AI suggests some Dead Sea Scrolls are up to 100 years older than previously thought, dating back to the late fourth century BCE. This challenges earlier estimations based on paleography and impacts our understanding of ancient Judaism and early Christianity.
What are the potential future applications of the AI model, 'Enoch,' developed in this study, and how might it transform the field of historical manuscript analysis?
This innovative methodology, combining refined radiocarbon dating with AI analysis, promises to revolutionize the dating of ancient manuscripts. Future applications could extend to other scripts like Syriac, Arabic, Greek, and Latin, potentially replacing destructive carbon dating methods while improving dating accuracy and efficiency. The study's impact extends beyond the Dead Sea Scrolls, setting a precedent for advancements in historical manuscript analysis.
What methodological improvements were made in the new study compared to earlier radiocarbon dating of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and how did these improvements affect the results?
The research combined modern radiocarbon dating techniques, addressing previous contamination issues, with an AI model called Enoch. Enoch, trained on dated scrolls, accurately predicted the age of other scrolls in 85% of cases, even narrowing down date ranges from carbon dating. This integrated approach significantly refines the dating of these historically significant texts.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The narrative frames the AI method as a significant advancement, emphasizing its potential to revolutionize manuscript dating. The headline and introduction highlight the surprising age of some scrolls, creating a sense of excitement and novelty. While positive, this framing might overshadow potential limitations or uncertainties.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and objective. Terms like "exciting" and "massive step forward" convey enthusiasm, but they don't detract from the factual reporting. The article uses precise terminology appropriate for a scientific subject.

2/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses primarily on the new dating method and its implications, potentially omitting discussions on alternative methodologies or controversies surrounding Dead Sea Scroll dating. While acknowledging limitations of space, a brief mention of other approaches could enhance completeness.

Sustainable Development Goals

Quality Education Positive
Indirect Relevance

The research improves our understanding of ancient texts, enhancing historical and cultural knowledge which contributes to education.