AI Model Predicts Risk of Over 1000 Diseases

AI Model Predicts Risk of Over 1000 Diseases

welt.de

AI Model Predicts Risk of Over 1000 Diseases

Researchers developed a new AI model, Delphi-2M, that predicts the risk of over 1000 diseases and health outcomes over 20 years, using data from 400,000 UK Biobank participants and 2 million from the Danish Disease Register.

German
Germany
HealthAiArtificial IntelligenceUk BiobankDisease PredictionDelphi-2MHealth Prediction
Europäisches Laboratorium Für MolekularbiologieUk Biobank
Robert Ranisch
What is the primary function and potential impact of the Delphi-2M AI model?
Delphi-2M predicts the risk of over 1000 diseases and 20-year health outcomes. This could enable proactive treatment and prevention planning, allowing individuals more control over their health. However, its accuracy varies across different diseases.
What data sources were used to train the model, and what are the limitations of this data?
The model was trained on data from 400,000 participants in the UK Biobank and 2 million from the Danish Disease Register. Limitations include overrepresentation of older British individuals, potentially leading to bias and discrimination against other demographic groups.
What ethical and legal concerns arise from using this type of predictive AI in healthcare, and what are the next steps for research?
Ethical concerns include potential for bias, misuse of health information, and psychological impact on healthy individuals deemed at risk. Legal ramifications remain unclear. Further research is needed to address these concerns and refine the model, including the addition of data such as blood values.

Cognitive Concepts

1/5

Framing Bias

The article presents a balanced view of the AI model's potential and limitations. While highlighting the model's ability to predict over 1000 diseases and its potential for personalized healthcare, it also includes warnings from experts about premature expectations and ethical concerns. The inclusion of both positive and negative perspectives prevents a one-sided narrative.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and objective. However, phrases like "relativ sichere Vorhersagen" (relatively safe predictions) could be considered slightly positive, while descriptions of the model's limitations as "mangelhaft" (deficient) lean towards negative connotations. More precise, neutral phrasing could improve objectivity.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article omits discussion of the specific algorithms used in the Delphi-2M model. Furthermore, the long-term financial implications of widespread adoption and the potential for healthcare disparities based on access are not explored. While acknowledging limitations in data representation, it could benefit from a more thorough analysis of potential biases based on race, socioeconomic status, or other factors.

2/5

Gender Bias

The article mentions that the model considers gender as a factor, but doesn't elaborate on whether this leads to gender-specific biases in predictions. Further investigation is needed to assess whether the model's reliance on gender data perpetuates or mitigates existing health inequalities. More information is needed to fully assess this aspect.

Sustainable Development Goals

Good Health and Well-being Positive
Direct Relevance

The development of a KI model that predicts the risk of over 1000 diseases and projects future health status has the potential to significantly improve healthcare. Early prediction allows for proactive interventions, preventative measures, and personalized treatments, thus improving the health and well-being of individuals. However, the model's limitations and potential biases need to be addressed.