Air India Crash: Pilot's Actions and Mental Health Under Scrutiny

Air India Crash: Pilot's Actions and Mental Health Under Scrutiny

elmundo.es

Air India Crash: Pilot's Actions and Mental Health Under Scrutiny

On June 12, 2025, Air India flight 241 crashed near Ahmedabad airport, killing 241 passengers and crew. An investigation suggests Captain Sumeet Sabharwal may have inadvertently shut off the engines, leading to the crash, and the airline is now facing scrutiny over its pilot mental health assessment procedures.

Spanish
Spain
International RelationsOtherMental HealthPlane CrashAviation SafetyAir IndiaPilot Error
Air IndiaWall Street Journal
Sumeet SabharwalClive KunderMohan Ranganathan
What is known about Captain Sabharwal's mental health, and how might this have contributed to the events leading to the crash?
U.S. sources involved in the accident investigation revealed to the Wall Street Journal that the co-pilot, Clive Kunder, expressed "surprise" after noticing the captain had moved the fuel switches to the "off" position. The ensuing argument between the captain and co-pilot, recorded in the cockpit voice recorder, ended with a Mayday call immediately before the crash. This raises questions about the captain's actions and decision-making in the moments leading up to the accident.
What were the key events in the cockpit of Air India flight before the crash, and what role did Captain Sabharwal's actions play in the accident?
I had promised that I would leave my job after one or two more flights and that I would dedicate myself to taking care of my father full-time," explained a heartbroken elderly man on June 20th, after receiving the remains of his son, Sumeet Sabharwal, the Air India captain who died when his plane crashed eight days prior after takeoff from Ahmedabad airport in western India. The crash killed 241 of the 242 people on board. Suspicions now point to the captain as responsible for the crash.
What implications does this accident have for airline procedures regarding pilot mental health evaluations and the safety protocols during critical phases of flight?
The revelation of Captain Sabharwal's potential depression, reported by several Air India pilots, adds a critical layer to the investigation. While he passed a medical examination in September 2024, the lack of corroboration from family and friends raises questions about the thoroughness of the airline's assessment of his mental health. The incident highlights the importance of robust mental health screening protocols within the aviation industry.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The article's framing strongly suggests Captain Sabharwal's guilt. The headline and introductory paragraphs emphasize the suspicions surrounding him and the details about the cockpit conversation are presented in a way that casts doubt on his actions. The article uses emotionally charged language such as "desconsolado" (desconsolate) when describing the father and then later focuses on suspicions, creating a narrative that biases the reader toward believing the captain was responsible.

3/5

Language Bias

The article uses language that evokes strong emotions and leans towards suggesting the captain's guilt. Phrases like "sospechas que apuntan a Sabharwal" (suspicions that point to Sabharwal) and descriptions of the copilot's "sorpresa" (surprise) and "pánico" (panic) are examples of this biased language. More neutral wording could replace these emotionally charged phrases. For example, instead of "sospechas" one could use "investigaciones" (investigations).

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the captain's potential responsibility, but omits details about the air traffic control's response and actions following the Mayday call. The investigation's progress beyond preliminary findings is also not detailed, leaving out crucial information regarding potential mechanical failures or other contributing factors to the crash. The article also does not mention any potential contributing factors from the copilot or other crew members. While the article mentions the captain's alleged depression, it also presents counterarguments from family and friends, however the article does not present a balanced view of the contradictory claims.

4/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by implicitly suggesting that the crash was solely caused either by Captain Sabharwal's actions or his mental health issues. It does not adequately explore other possibilities, such as mechanical failures, air traffic control errors or other contributing factors. The narrative focuses primarily on the captain, neglecting the complexities of air accidents.

Sustainable Development Goals

Good Health and Well-being Negative
Direct Relevance

The article highlights the potential impact of a pilot's undiagnosed or untreated depression on aviation safety, resulting in a fatal accident. This directly relates to SDG 3, which aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. The mental health of pilots is crucial for safe operation and this case tragically demonstrates the potential consequences of neglecting this aspect.