forbes.com
AMS and AGU Launch Joint Climate Change Initiative After NCA Author Dismissals
Following the dismissal of all authors working on the National Climate Assessment, the American Meteorological Society and the American Geophysical Union launched a joint initiative to publish a special collection of peer-reviewed articles on climate change in the United States, covering observations, projections, impacts, risks, and solutions.
- How will this new initiative address the disruption caused by the dismissal of all authors from the National Climate Assessment?
- The initiative responds to the disruption of the NCA process. AMS and AGU, with their extensive networks and established journals, provide a platform for continued climate research and dissemination of findings to inform policy and public understanding. This collaborative effort aims to fill the gap left by the halted NCA and ensure the continuation of vital climate science.
- What prompted the American Meteorological Society and the American Geophysical Union to create this new climate change science collection?
- The American Meteorological Society (AMS) and the American Geophysical Union (AGU), two leading U.S. science organizations, are launching a joint initiative to publish a special collection of peer-reviewed articles on climate change in the U.S. This follows the dismissal of all authors working on the National Climate Assessment (NCA), a quadrennial report to Congress and the President. The new collection will cover observations, projections, impacts, risks, and solutions.
- What are the potential long-term implications of this collaborative effort for the production and dissemination of climate change science in the U.S. and beyond?
- This joint effort signifies a shift in how climate change science is produced and disseminated in the U.S., potentially setting a precedent for future collaborations between scientific organizations and government. The long-term impact will depend on the collection's reach, influence on policy, and ability to maintain scientific rigor in the face of political challenges.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the AMS and AGU's actions in a very positive light, highlighting their prestige and emphasizing their commitment to filling the void left by the dismissed climate report authors. The language used is largely celebratory and supportive of these organizations. While this is not inherently biased, it might present a somewhat incomplete picture by potentially downplaying any potential drawbacks or limitations of their initiative.
Language Bias
The article uses positive and strong language when discussing the AMS and AGU ("grabbing the baton", "gold standards", "most trusted"). While this might reflect the author's genuine enthusiasm, it could also be perceived as subtly biased. More neutral terms could be used to describe the organizations' actions and contributions.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the actions of the AMS and AGU, providing detail on their history and initiatives. However, it omits discussion of potential alternative organizations or initiatives that might be addressing the gap left by the dismissed climate report authors. While acknowledging space constraints is valid, omitting alternative approaches could limit the reader's understanding of the broader response to the situation. It also doesn't discuss the reasons behind the dismissal of the original authors, which is a significant missing piece of context.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view by framing the situation as a straightforward choice between the discontinued NCA report and the new AMS/AGU initiative. It doesn't explore the possibility of other solutions or the potential for both to co-exist or complement each other. This simplification might lead readers to perceive a false dichotomy and miss the nuances of the situation.
Gender Bias
The article doesn't exhibit overt gender bias. However, it would be beneficial to include information about the gender balance within the AMS, AGU, and among the scientists involved in both the original report and the new initiative to provide a more complete picture of gender representation within the climate science community.
Sustainable Development Goals
The American Meteorological Society (AMS) and the American Geophysical Union (AGU) are stepping up to fill the gap left by the dismissal of authors from a major U.S. climate report. They are creating a new collection of peer-reviewed research on climate change in the United States, ensuring that climate science continues to be produced and disseminated. This directly supports climate action by providing crucial data and analysis for informed decision-making and policy development. The initiative highlights the importance of independent scientific research in addressing climate change.