jpost.com
Amsterdam Pogrom and Media Bias
Analysis of the Amsterdam pogrom against Israeli soccer fans, highlighting biased media coverage and the rise of antisemitism.
English
Israel
PoliticsHuman Rights ViolationsIsraelNetherlandsViolenceAntisemitismMedia
HonestreportingThe Jerusalem PostThe New York TimesReutersThe Guardian
Anne FrankZvika KleinMichel TheeboomFemke HalsemaSheher Khan
- What was the main event described in the article?
- The Amsterdam pogrom involved a violent attack on Israeli soccer fans by a mob chanting "Free Palestine." The incident highlighted a rise in antisemitic incidents in Amsterdam, reaching a four-decade high.
- What are the consequences of the biased media coverage?
- The lack of proper media coverage allowed antisemitic narratives to spread, obscuring the hateful nature of the attacks. This creates a climate of fear and intolerance, affecting Jews both in Amsterdam and globally.
- How did international media outlets portray the Amsterdam incident?
- International media outlets largely downplayed the antisemitic nature of the attack, often framing it as a simple soccer-related clash or suggesting the Israelis were somehow at fault. This biased reporting failed to acknowledge the premeditation and anti-Jewish hatred behind the violence.
- What evidence suggests the attacks were premeditated and antisemitic?
- The author, an executive director of HonestReporting, points to evidence of pre-planned attacks, including Telegram messages calling for a "Jew hunt." They also highlight the failure of Dutch police to adequately protect Jewish sites and events.
- What are the author's personal feelings and concerns regarding the situation?
- The author expresses concern for their children's safety and their unwillingness to visit Amsterdam due to the rise in antisemitism, preferring to remain in Israel despite the ongoing rocket fire.