theglobeandmail.com
Ancient Hawaiian Petroglyphs Re-emerge on Oahu
A panel of 26 ancient Hawaiian petroglyphs, mostly human-like figures, has reappeared on Oahu's coast due to seasonal ocean swells removing overlying sand; this is the first time the entire panel has been visible since 2014, offering insights into the area's history and the impact of rising sea levels.
- How do the petroglyphs' temporary exposure connect to broader patterns of environmental change and cultural preservation efforts?
- The petroglyphs' reappearance is linked to fluctuating wave patterns caused by low-pressure systems in the eastern Pacific. These systems erode shoreline sand, temporarily exposing the ancient carvings. The largest figure is interpreted by cultural practitioner Glen Kila as representing the rising and setting sun, suggesting a religious or ceremonial significance.
- What is the significance of the newly visible Hawaiian petroglyphs on Oahu, and what immediate impacts does their discovery have?
- Seasonal ocean swells have revealed a panel of 26 Hawaiian petroglyphs on Oahu, visible for the first time in years. The images, mostly human-like stick figures, are located on a sandstone stretch and are easily seen during low tide. This marks the first time the entire panel has been visible since its discovery nine years ago.
- What are the long-term implications for the protection and accessibility of the petroglyphs, considering the challenges of balancing cultural heritage, environmental factors, and public interest?
- The temporary exposure of the petroglyphs highlights the impact of climate change and rising sea levels on coastal archaeological sites. The Army's efforts to balance preservation with public access present a challenge, demanding careful consideration of both cultural sensitivity and environmental protection. Further research could reveal more about the petroglyphs' creation and meaning.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the rediscovery as a positive event, emphasizing the cultural significance for Native Hawaiians and the wonder of the discovery for visitors. This framing is understandable given the context, but it might unintentionally downplay potential concerns about preservation or conflicting interests.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and descriptive. Terms like "traditional marvels" and "awesome" might carry some positive connotation, but they are not overly loaded or inflammatory. The description of the petroglyphs as "human-looking stick figures" is factual and avoids subjective interpretation.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the rediscovery and cultural significance of the petroglyphs, but it lacks detail on the specific challenges the Army faces in balancing preservation with public access. While mentioning the difficulty of dating petroglyphs, it doesn't elaborate on the dating methods used or the range of uncertainty involved. There's also limited discussion of potential threats to the petroglyphs beyond casual visitor impact.
Sustainable Development Goals
The rediscovery and potential protection of the ancient Hawaiian petroglyphs contribute to the preservation of cultural heritage, a key aspect of sustainable urban development. The involvement of the US Army in balancing accessibility with protection demonstrates a step towards sustainable management of cultural resources within the community.