
forbes.com
Atlantic Hurricane Season: Impactful Storms Despite Lower ACE
Despite a lower-than-average Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) of just over 1 compared to the typical 9, this year's Atlantic hurricane season is not significantly behind schedule; Tropical Storms Barry and Chantal caused significant flooding in Texas and North Carolina, and the most active period is yet to come.
- How do the current meteorological conditions and model predictions influence the anticipated future activity of the Atlantic hurricane season?
- The perception of a slow start stems from focusing on ACE and landfalls, which underrepresent the full impact. This year's third named storm formed earlier than average, and the most active period—August to October—is yet to come. Current meteorological conditions, while initially unfavorable, are expected to improve.
- What are the immediate impacts of this year's Atlantic hurricane season, considering the lower-than-average ACE and the timing of storm development?
- While Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) is lower than average, at just over 1 compared to the typical 9, this year's Atlantic hurricane season is not significantly behind schedule. Tropical Storms Barry and Chantal caused significant flooding in Texas and North Carolina, respectively, demonstrating impactful weather despite lower ACE.
- What are the long-term implications of focusing on specific indices like ACE, rather than the overall impact of hurricanes, for effective risk communication and preparedness?
- The upcoming weeks will be crucial. European and AI models predict increased activity, potentially challenging the notion of a slow start. The focus should shift from indices to the actual impacts of storms, which may exceed expectations despite lower-than-average ACE.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the discussion by initially acknowledging the perception of a slow start but then refutes it using various arguments. The choice to begin by addressing and seemingly validating the concerns before counter-arguing subtly influences the reader to weigh the author's perspective more favorably. The author's own opinion is presented as a counterpoint to a less-credible perspective, which shapes the narrative.
Language Bias
The author uses informal language ("jargony term", "pet peeves") that may not reflect the seriousness of the topic. The description of the European model 'teasing' activity is not strictly neutral, but instead uses anthropomorphic language. The term "bullish" in describing AI predictions is also informally optimistic. More neutral alternatives could be 'suggesting' instead of 'teasing' and 'predicting increased activity' instead of 'bullish'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) index and the number of landfalling storms as indicators of hurricane season activity. However, it omits discussion of other significant impacts, such as the economic costs associated with evacuations, damage to infrastructure, and the disruption of daily life. While the article mentions flooding caused by Barry and Chantal, a more comprehensive accounting of the overall impact would strengthen the analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the discussion as either the hurricane season is 'behind schedule' or 'not really.' It overlooks the complexity of hurricane prediction and the various ways to measure season activity. The article acknowledges different perspectives but doesn't fully explore the nuances of the debate.
Sustainable Development Goals
The catastrophic flooding caused by Tropical Storm Barry in Texas Hill Country and the dangerous flooding in North Carolina due to Tropical Storm Chantal disproportionately impact vulnerable populations and exacerbate existing inequalities, potentially pushing more people into poverty.