lemonde.fr
BAFTA 2024: Conclave and The Brutalist Dominate Amidst Controversy
At the 2024 British Academy Film Awards (BAFTAs), Conclave and The Brutalist each won four awards, while Emilia Perez won two despite controversies, and Mikey Madison unexpectedly won Best Actress.
- How did the controversies surrounding Emilia Perez affect the film's reception and the BAFTAs ceremony?
- Conclave's success, along with The Brutalist's wins, highlights the awards' focus on diverse filmmaking styles and narratives. The controversies surrounding Emilia Perez, including accusations of racism and AI voice enhancement, show the tension between artistic merit and public perception. The unexpected win by Mikey Madison underscores the unpredictable nature of award ceremonies.
- What were the most significant outcomes of the 2024 BAFTAs, and what do they indicate about current trends in cinema?
- The 2024 BAFTAs saw Conclave and The Brutalist win four awards each, with Emilia Perez receiving two despite recent controversies. Mikey Madison surprisingly won Best Actress for Anora, beating favorite Demi Moore. Edward Berger's Conclave was named Best Film.
- What are the potential long-term implications of the BAFTAs' recognition of films addressing complex social and ethical issues?
- The BAFTAs' choices suggest a shift towards narratives exploring complex themes like the Holocaust and gender transition, as seen in The Brutalist and Emilia Perez, respectively. The controversies surrounding Emilia Perez could signal future challenges for films grappling with ethical concerns regarding casting and production techniques. The success of smaller films like Anora indicates growing diversity in recognized cinematic talent.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's emphasis on the controversies surrounding "Emilia Perez" and the contrasting success of "Conclave" and "The Brutalist" shapes the narrative. The headline and introduction could be perceived as prioritizing the scandal aspect over a balanced overview of all the awards given. The frequent mention of the Oscars further reinforces this focus on the controversy and its potential impact on the upcoming ceremony.
Language Bias
The article uses descriptive language that sometimes leans towards subjective opinions. For example, describing "Emilia Perez" as "cerné par les polémiques" (besieged by controversies) is more loaded than a neutral description of the situation. Similarly, phrases such as "grand vainqueur" (grand winner) and "épopée architecturale" (architectural epic) add subjective coloring to the descriptions of the films. The language used to describe the success of other films is comparatively less intense.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the winners and the controversies surrounding "Emilia Perez," but provides limited detail on other nominated films beyond their wins or losses. The omission of in-depth analysis of other films might leave the reader with an incomplete picture of the broader awards ceremony and the cinematic landscape it represents. There is no mention of the reasons behind the wins of some films which won in technical categories. This may be due to space constraints, but it contributes to an unbalanced presentation.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by repeatedly contrasting the success of "Conclave" and "The Brutalist" with the controversies surrounding "Emilia Perez." This framing might lead the reader to perceive the awards as a battle between artistic merit and scandal, rather than a more nuanced reflection of diverse cinematic achievements.
Gender Bias
The article describes Mikey Madison's win as a surprise, possibly implying that female actors are less likely to win such awards. While it celebrates Zoe Saldana's win and her dedication, there's no explicit gender bias. However, the focus on personal details (age, relationship status) is used more frequently for women (Mikey Madison, Kylie Jenner) than for men.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the success of "Conclave," a film exploring power dynamics and betrayal within the papacy. This indirectly relates to SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) by showcasing themes of power imbalances and social hierarchies, prompting reflection on systemic inequalities. The success of a film addressing such themes can raise awareness and stimulate discussions about inequality.