forbes.com
Black-Owned Streaming Platforms Challenge Industry Norms with Equitable Revenue Sharing
Two new streaming platforms, Blacktivity and In The Black Network, are disrupting the entertainment industry by offering equitable revenue-sharing models and community support to Black creators, addressing the historical underrepresentation and exploitation of Black talent in media.
- How do Blacktivity and In The Black Network address the historical underrepresentation of Black creators in the entertainment industry, and what broader systemic issues do they aim to change?
- These platforms address the systemic underrepresentation and exploitation of Black creators in the entertainment industry, where Black professionals hold less than 6% of executive positions despite Black audiences consuming 35% more streaming content than the general population. Both platforms aim to empower Black creators by providing resources, community building, and fair compensation.
- What are the key differences between Blacktivity and In The Black Network's approaches to content licensing and revenue sharing, and what immediate impact do these models have on Black creators?
- Blacktivity, a non-profit streaming platform, and In The Black Network, a hybrid AVOD/TVOD platform, are challenging traditional entertainment models by prioritizing Black creators and offering equitable revenue sharing. Blacktivity provides a 50/50 revenue split for non-exclusive content and 60/40 for exclusive deals, while In The Black Network offers performance-based splits.
- What challenges do Blacktivity and In The Black Network face in disrupting the existing entertainment industry model, and what long-term impact could their success have on the industry's future?
- The success of Blacktivity and In The Black Network could signal a shift towards more equitable models in the entertainment industry, impacting how streaming platforms compensate and empower creators. Their focus on community building and fostering authentic storytelling could influence future platform designs and content creation strategies.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the story around the success and positive impact of Blacktivity and In The Black Network, highlighting their equitable practices. While this is important, the article might benefit from including counterpoints or challenges faced by these platforms to offer a more balanced perspective.
Language Bias
The article uses positive and empowering language to describe Blacktivity and In The Black Network, which is appropriate given their missions. However, the frequent use of terms like "disrupt," "charge," and "revolutionize" could be seen as slightly hyperbolic and less neutral.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on two specific platforms, Blacktivity and In The Black Network, and doesn't discuss other initiatives addressing similar issues within the entertainment industry. While this doesn't necessarily indicate bias, a broader overview of the landscape might provide more comprehensive context and avoid a potentially limited perspective.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a clear dichotomy between traditional streaming models and the new models offered by Blacktivity and In The Black Network, suggesting that these platforms are the only alternatives. However, there may be other models that promote equity and creator ownership, and the article's framing might neglect this nuance.
Gender Bias
The article features two Black men and one Black woman as leaders in this movement. While not inherently biased, more diverse representation in leadership positions within the article might enhance its inclusiveness.
Sustainable Development Goals
Blacktivity and In The Black Network are directly addressing the economic disparity in the entertainment industry by ensuring fair compensation and ownership for Black creators. This actively works against the historical underrepresentation and exploitation of Black talent in media, promoting equitable distribution of wealth and opportunity.