kathimerini.gr
China's Lab-Grown Diamonds Disrupt Global Market
China's mass production of lab-grown diamonds, with 70% of lab-grown diamonds for jewelry originating from Chinese factories, has drastically impacted the natural diamond market, causing price drops and reduced sales for companies like De Beers.
- How has the rapid rise of lab-grown diamond production in China impacted the global diamond market and major players like De Beers?
- In 2025, Chinese companies like Jiaruifu in Henan province produce 3-carat lab-grown diamonds in just seven days, manufacturing about 100,000 carats monthly. Over 70% of lab-grown diamonds for jewelry originate from China, primarily processed in India before reaching global markets via Dubai and Antwerp.
- What is the historical context of lab-grown diamond production in China, and how did it contribute to the current market dominance?
- This rapid, mass production of lab-grown diamonds, significantly cheaper than mined diamonds (93% lower price for a 3-carat stone), has disrupted the traditional diamond industry. China's role is central, stemming from its early development of this technology for military purposes following the Sino-Soviet split.
- What are the long-term implications of this technological advancement for the natural diamond industry, considering the continuous decrease in price and sales?
- The plummeting prices and sales of natural diamonds, even with price drops, are severely impacting companies like De Beers, Alrosa, Rio Tinto, and Petra Diamonds. De Beers' revenue halved in two years, and is now up for sale, potentially fetching less than its estimated $4.9 billion valuation. This signifies a major shift in the global diamond market.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the disruptive impact of lab-grown diamonds on the traditional diamond industry. The headline (if there was one) and introductory paragraphs likely focus on the speed and efficiency of lab-grown production, potentially overshadowing other relevant aspects such as ethical concerns or the inherent value associated with natural diamonds. The use of phrases like "catastrophic" for the impact on the traditional industry further strengthens this bias.
Language Bias
The article uses somewhat charged language, describing the impact on the traditional diamond industry as "catastrophic." While the impact is significant, the word choice is emotionally loaded. More neutral alternatives could be used, such as "significant disruption" or "substantial challenges." The repeated emphasis on the speed and low cost of lab-grown diamonds could also be interpreted as subtly favoring this industry.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the rise of lab-grown diamonds and the decline of the natural diamond industry, potentially omitting perspectives from smaller players in the lab-grown diamond market or perspectives on the environmental impact of both natural and lab-grown diamond mining and production. The long-term economic and social consequences for diamond mining communities are also not explored.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy between natural and lab-grown diamonds, framing them as opposing forces in a zero-sum game. While it acknowledges the historical context, it doesn't fully explore potential collaborations or alternative market structures that could allow both industries to coexist.
Sustainable Development Goals
The mass production of lab-grown diamonds offers a more sustainable alternative to mined diamonds, reducing the environmental impact associated with diamond mining. This aligns with SDG 12, which promotes sustainable consumption and production patterns. The significantly lower price of lab-grown diamonds also makes them more accessible, contributing to responsible consumption.